2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved protocol for the simultaneous extraction and column-based separation of DNA and RNA from different soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrate that the 9 different protocols actually result in a distinct phylogenetic composition of the nucleic acids recovered. This substantiates previous findings that were based on low-resolution fingerprint analyses (24,26,27).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Diversity Analysessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results demonstrate that the 9 different protocols actually result in a distinct phylogenetic composition of the nucleic acids recovered. This substantiates previous findings that were based on low-resolution fingerprint analyses (24,26,27).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Diversity Analysessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Indirect methods typically yield longer nucleic acid fragments which are useful for metagenomic studies (10,15) but often result in a significantly lower yield and diversity of nucleic acid molecules (10,16). Existing protocols for the direct extraction of DNA and RNA from soils (13,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) have partly been evaluated (19,21,24,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), but only a few studies have compared extraction efficiencies of methods recovering both DNA and RNA (21,24). In particular, these methods have so far not been compared with extraction protocols optimized for either DNA or RNA alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One gram of macerated nodules (2× 0.5 g) was extracted according to Töwe et al (2011). The quality and quantity of the DNA extracts were evaluated in 1% agarose gels and using the PicoGreen dsDNA quantification assay (Invitrogen, USA), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted from 0.3 g soil via phenolchloroform-based extraction described by Töwe et al (2011), using a Precellys24 Instrument (PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany). Quality and quantity of the nucleic acids were checked using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany) and gel electrophoresis.…”
Section: Dna Extraction Pcr and 454 Pyro-sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%