2014
DOI: 10.3233/mas-130278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved randomized response models using three decks of cards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greenberg et al [3] extended the Warner's model by introducing unrelated innocuous attribute say, X as a replacement of A c in their RRT model. Some other developments in RRT are due to Chaudhuri and Mukerjee [4], Mahmood et al [5], Perri [6], Hussain and Shabbir [7], Lee et al [8], Abdelfatah and Mazloum [9], Tanveer and Singh [10; 11], Blair et al [12], Singh and Gorey [13], Bose [14] and Abid et al [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenberg et al [3] extended the Warner's model by introducing unrelated innocuous attribute say, X as a replacement of A c in their RRT model. Some other developments in RRT are due to Chaudhuri and Mukerjee [4], Mahmood et al [5], Perri [6], Hussain and Shabbir [7], Lee et al [8], Abdelfatah and Mazloum [9], Tanveer and Singh [10; 11], Blair et al [12], Singh and Gorey [13], Bose [14] and Abid et al [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odumade and Singh (2009) and Singh and Sedory (2011) have investigated a new estimator for estimating the proportion of a sensitive attribute by making use of two decks of cards. There are many models that have been developed and compared with the Warner (1965) model by several researchers, for example, refer to Mangat and Singh (1990), Mangat (1994), Gjestvang and Singh (2006), Perri (2013, 2014), Diana, Giordan, and Perri (2013), and Abdelfatah and Mazloum (2014) among others. An extensive review of literature on randomized response sampling can be found in monographs by Chaudhuri (2011) and Chaudhuri and Christofides (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%