2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2007.4379827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Rate Control and Motion Estimation for H.264 Encoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We apply the proposed approach to six kernels: multiplication of two 64 × 64 matrices (MAT64), the motion estimation (ME) algorithm [15] used in X264, the Sobel edge detection algorithm (Sobel) [17], Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of Asian Option Pricing [16], 1-D correlation and k-means clustering [18]; Table 3 shows benchmark parameters. Each benchmark contains the MapReduce patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We apply the proposed approach to six kernels: multiplication of two 64 × 64 matrices (MAT64), the motion estimation (ME) algorithm [15] used in X264, the Sobel edge detection algorithm (Sobel) [17], Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of Asian Option Pricing [16], 1-D correlation and k-means clustering [18]; Table 3 shows benchmark parameters. Each benchmark contains the MapReduce patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vanam [15], used in X264, is highly computation- intensive. To determine the motion vectors for each macro block of the frame being encoded, the algorithm performs multiple searches on the reference frames.…”
Section: Fast Motion Estimation Algorithm By Merritt Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The R-D optimization algorithm in x264 applies empirical models to select a QP for the each frame, which is subsequently mapped to a λ, in order to achieve a target bitrate [4]. The remaining encoding decisions are made by minimizing Eq.…”
Section: A Quality Optimized Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The x264 encoder was compared with different commercial H.264 encoders and found to provide the best quality in terms of PSNR, DCT-based video quality metric, and structural similarity metric [4]. In [5], the x264 encoder was compared with the JM reference encoder (ver 10.2) [6] and was shown to be 50 times faster while providing bit rates within 5% for the same PSNR.…”
Section: The Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%