RANLP 2017 - Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing Meet Deep Learning 2017
DOI: 10.26615/978-954-452-049-6_051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Recognition and Normalisation of Polish Temporal Expressions

Abstract: In this article we present the result of the recent research in the recognition and normalisation of Polish temporal expressions. The temporal information extracted from the text plays major role in many information extraction systems, like question answering, event recognition or discourse analysis. We proposed a new method for the temporal expressions normalisation, called Cascade of Partial Rules. Here we describe results achieved by updated version of Liner2 machine learning system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used WCRFT tagger [29], which utilises Toki [30] to tokenise the input text before the creation of the embeddings model. The comparison of EC1 with previous results obtained using only CRF [9] show the significant improvement across all the tested metrics: 3.6pp increase in strict F1-score, 1.36pp increase in relaxed precision, 5.61pp increase in relaxed recall and 3.51pp increase in relaxed F1-score. Table 9: Evaluation results for all TIMEX3 classes (total) for 9 word embeddings models (3 best models from each embeddings group: EE, EP, EC from Table 8) using the following measures from [35]: strict precision, strict recall, strict F1-score, relaxed precision, relaxed recall, relaxed F1-score, type F1-score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used WCRFT tagger [29], which utilises Toki [30] to tokenise the input text before the creation of the embeddings model. The comparison of EC1 with previous results obtained using only CRF [9] show the significant improvement across all the tested metrics: 3.6pp increase in strict F1-score, 1.36pp increase in relaxed precision, 5.61pp increase in relaxed recall and 3.51pp increase in relaxed F1-score. Table 9: Evaluation results for all TIMEX3 classes (total) for 9 word embeddings models (3 best models from each embeddings group: EE, EP, EC from Table 8) using the following measures from [35]: strict precision, strict recall, strict F1-score, relaxed precision, relaxed recall, relaxed F1-score, type F1-score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We trained the final models using the train set and we evaluated it using the test set, which was the reproduction of analysis performed in articles [11,9]. The division is presented in Table ??.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This tool was successfully used in other Natural Language Engineering tasks, mainly in Named Entities Recognition Marcińczuk and Kocoń (2013); Marcińczuk et al (2013). We described our first approach to recognise timexes using this tool Kocoń and Marcińczuk (2015) and this work extends that research.…”
Section: Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 57%