2020
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2020-321
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved representation of river runoff in Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean Version 4 (ECCOv4) simulations: implementation, evaluation and impacts to coastal plume regions

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, we improve the representation of global river runoff in the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO) framework, allowing for a more realistic treatment of coastal plume dynamics. We use a suite of experiments to explore the sensitivity of coastal plume regions to runoff forcing, model grid resolution, and grid type. The results show that simulated Sea-Surface Salinity (SSS) is reduced as the model grid resolution increases. Compared to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SM… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we do not include biogeochemical runoff (i.e., DIC and nutrients, Mayorga et al., 2010), which may be critical for accurate simulation of Arctic Ocean biogeochemistry (Le Fouest et al., 2013, 2015). Future efforts should incorporate time‐varying, point‐source global freshwater (Feng et al., 2021) and biogeochemical runoff (Resplandy et al., 2018) to improve the simulated ocean sink in coastal (Chen et al., 2013) and high‐latitude regions (Hopwood et al., 2018, 2020; Wadham et al., 2019). Finally, ECCO‐Darwin does not contain an explicit representation of bottom sediment dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we do not include biogeochemical runoff (i.e., DIC and nutrients, Mayorga et al., 2010), which may be critical for accurate simulation of Arctic Ocean biogeochemistry (Le Fouest et al., 2013, 2015). Future efforts should incorporate time‐varying, point‐source global freshwater (Feng et al., 2021) and biogeochemical runoff (Resplandy et al., 2018) to improve the simulated ocean sink in coastal (Chen et al., 2013) and high‐latitude regions (Hopwood et al., 2018, 2020; Wadham et al., 2019). Finally, ECCO‐Darwin does not contain an explicit representation of bottom sediment dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a). The STV in the outflow of the Congo River near the coast of Africa is much smaller in the model than in the mooring data, possibly due to the model's use of climatological river outflow (Feng et al, 2021;Fekete et al, 2002). A similar set of maps for the RE was created for the model output but is not included here for brevity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al. (2021) has conducted a preliminary assessment of the impact of JRA55‐do discharge in various ECCO solutions of different resolutions, including LLC270. The use of higher‐resolution models would be of interest to further investigate the impacts of nonseasonal discharge on SSS and SSH near the river mouths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%