2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-020-01455-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved results on planar Kirchhoff-type elliptic problems with critical exponential growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arora et al 29 showed the existence and multiplicity of Kirchhoff equation with exponential nonlinearity of Choquard type. In Chen et al, 32 the authors proved the existence of nontrivial solutions and Nehari-type ground state solutions for (1.1) with N = 2. Moreover, they obtained a more precise estimation than the ones in the existing literature about the minimax level.…”
Section: Problem (11) Is Called Nonlocal Because Of the Presence Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Arora et al 29 showed the existence and multiplicity of Kirchhoff equation with exponential nonlinearity of Choquard type. In Chen et al, 32 the authors proved the existence of nontrivial solutions and Nehari-type ground state solutions for (1.1) with N = 2. Moreover, they obtained a more precise estimation than the ones in the existing literature about the minimax level.…”
Section: Problem (11) Is Called Nonlocal Because Of the Presence Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above condition was introduced in Chen et al, 32 in which the existence of positive ground state solution for Equation (1.1) with N = 2 is obtained under (F4 ′ ) and some other assumptions. (F4 ′ ) weakens the following assumption: which was proposed in Figueiredo and Severo.…”
Section: Problem (11) Is Called Nonlocal Because Of the Presence Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark Since limt+t2Fi(x,t)eα0t2=limt+2Fi(x,t)+tfi(x,t)2α0eα0t2. Hence, (F5) can be deduced by the following hypothesis: lim inft+tfifalse(x,tfalse)eα0t2β0>1α0 uniformly on x2. Clearly, (F5 ′ ′ ) is much weaker than (F5 ′ ) in do Ó and de Albuquerque 17 . In our arguments, we adopt the approach used in Chen, Tang and Wei 40 to estimate precisely the mountain pass level c ∗ ; see Lemma 3.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%