2018
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-6539-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved retrievals of carbon dioxide from Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 with the version 8 ACOS algorithm

Abstract: Abstract. Since September 2014, NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite has been taking measurements of reflected solar spectra and using them to infer atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. This work provides details of the OCO-2 retrieval algorithm, versions 7 and 8, used to derive the column-averaged dry air mole fraction of atmospheric CO2 (XCO2) for the roughly 100 000 cloud-free measurements recorded by OCO-2 each day. The algorithm is based on the Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space (A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
327
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
6
327
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation and bias correction have been important elements of the data processing strategy for OCO-2 as the OCO-2 XCO 2 retrieval algorithm continues to evolve [22]. The study by Wunch et al [18] provides a comprehensive validation of the Version 7 retrospective (V7r) XCO 2 product against the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON), and found that the absolute median difference is less than 0.4 ppm and the RMS difference less than 1.5 ppm.…”
Section: Oco-2 Co 2 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation and bias correction have been important elements of the data processing strategy for OCO-2 as the OCO-2 XCO 2 retrieval algorithm continues to evolve [22]. The study by Wunch et al [18] provides a comprehensive validation of the Version 7 retrospective (V7r) XCO 2 product against the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON), and found that the absolute median difference is less than 0.4 ppm and the RMS difference less than 1.5 ppm.…”
Section: Oco-2 Co 2 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sensitivity to the variation in observation data, we use the three latest versions (v7, v8, and v9) of OCO-2 XCO 2 to form the observation vector y. Between the v7 and v8 data, there are a large number of changes in the OCO-2 XCO 2 retrieval algorithm related to spectroscopy, aerosol treatment, the surface model, and prior meteorology [29]. The differences between the v8 and v9 data are mainly from an update in surface pressure estimation [30].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the plume was located largely north of the river (figure 2(d)), the WRF-Chem simulations put the plume south of the river (figures 2(c) and (e)). In comparison, Nassar et al [1] achieved an estimation of 29 wind direction adjustment to optimize the match between the Gaussian plume model and the plume detected by the OCO-2 data. We note that the simulated low wind speed (∼2 m s −1 ) in this case is more likely to be associated with variability in wind direction, as smaller scale features that are difficult to resolve exert greater influence in the absence of stronger winds.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The O 2 A-band spectra have high sensitivity to changes in the light path. They are primarily used to determine the surface pressure, to screen for optically thick clouds and to quantify the total optical depth (AOD) and vertical distribution of aerosols for soundings that are sufficiently optically thin (AOD < 0.3) to yield accurate estimates of the column average CO 2 dry air mole fraction, XCO 2 (O'Dell et al, 2018).…”
Section: Oco-2 and Calipso Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%