2009
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1733509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved RNA preservation for immunolabeling and laser microdissection

Abstract: Microdissection techniques have the potential to allow for transcriptome analyses in specific populations of cells that are isolated from heterogeneous tissues such as the nervous system and certain cancers. Problematically, RNA is not stable under the labeling conditions usually needed to identify the cells of interest for microdissection. We have developed an immunolabeling method that utilizes a high salt buffer to stabilize RNA during prolonged antibody incubations. We first assessed RNA integrity by three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in these conditions, the addition of RNAse inhibitor in all solutions is effective in preserving RNA from being degraded. The use of high salt conditions applied during antibody incubation has been previously shown to be effective in preserving RNA 9,10 . However, this alternative method remains limited to quick staining using robust antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in these conditions, the addition of RNAse inhibitor in all solutions is effective in preserving RNA from being degraded. The use of high salt conditions applied during antibody incubation has been previously shown to be effective in preserving RNA 9,10 . However, this alternative method remains limited to quick staining using robust antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been previously performed and briefly described in few publications 1,[9][10][11][12][13] . Here, we demonstrate a detailed procedure to obtain high-quality RNA from a specific subset of cells in a complex tissue structure by combining quick immunolabeling with LCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short incubation times are due to the use of high concentrations of primary and secondary antibodies, concentrations that are around 10-20 fold higher than what is necessary for conventional immunohistochemistry with a 2 h incubation. If however, longer incubation times are required, Brown and Smith used high salt buffers to inhibit RNA degradation and obtain good quality RNA with long incubation times (up to 20 h) 13 . This approach can also be used if there is substantial time required between labeling of the tissue and getting access to a LCM system.…”
Section: Direct Versus Indirect Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, four equidistant slides along the rostral-caudal extent of the SN were selected, the tissue sections rinsed in 1xPBS and fixed in acetone. Following fixation, sections were incubated in 2 M NaCl PBS to improve mRNA stability (Brown et al, 2013;Brown and Smith, 2009). Sections were incubated overnight at 4 • C in mouse anti-Th monoclonal antibody (Millipore, Australia) diluted 1:100 in 2 M NaCl PBS.…”
Section: Sn Da Neuron Immunolabellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) performed in high salt buffer to maximise RNA preservation (Brown and Smith, 2009). Cells positive for both Th immunofluorescence and the nuclear stain Hoechst, were laser microdissected and catapulted into RNA lysis buffer containing carrier RNA.…”
Section: Laser Capture Microdissection Of Sn Da Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%