2023
DOI: 10.35848/1347-4065/acc749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved robustness of multi-component analysis in amplitude envelope statistics using plane waves

Abstract: We compared the evaluation accuracy of amplitude envelope statistics under the transmission and reception conditions of compounded plane wave imaging (CPWI) and focused beam imaging (FBI). In a basic study using a homogeneous phantom, we found that the amplitude gradient in the depth direction and the PSF in the lateral direction spread in the FBI reduced the accuracy of evaluation in amplitude envelope statistics. On the other hand, CPWI showed a more stable evaluation than FBI because of the elimination of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies on the influence of sound field characteristics, the amplitude envelope and backscattering properties of phantoms containing 5-40 μm acrylic scatterers were evaluated. 7,43,46) Using nylon spheroids to model normal liver, the scattering intensity from acrylic spheroids with diameters of 30 or 40 μm was too strong to mimic scattering from real fat droplets. Therefore, 10 μm acrylic spheroids were chosen to visualize the effect of small fat droplets on high-resolution measurements using HF ultrasound.…”
Section: Tissue-mimicking Phantoms With Multiple Types Of Scatterersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In previous studies on the influence of sound field characteristics, the amplitude envelope and backscattering properties of phantoms containing 5-40 μm acrylic scatterers were evaluated. 7,43,46) Using nylon spheroids to model normal liver, the scattering intensity from acrylic spheroids with diameters of 30 or 40 μm was too strong to mimic scattering from real fat droplets. Therefore, 10 μm acrylic spheroids were chosen to visualize the effect of small fat droplets on high-resolution measurements using HF ultrasound.…”
Section: Tissue-mimicking Phantoms With Multiple Types Of Scatterersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the relationships between the physical characteristics of the tissue, the shape of the transducer, and the characteristics of the transmitting and receiving ultrasound fields all affect the evaluation of the amplitude envelope characteristics. [44][45][46] In past studies, Ujihara et al applied focused-beam imaging and compound plane-wave imaging (CPWI) 47) to amplitude envelope characterization. CPWI has more uniform sound field characteristics than focused beam imaging (FBI) and can be applied to the multi-Rayleigh model to evaluate fat mass with high robustness, and it has been confirmed that the ultrasound transmission and reception field characteristics affect the accuracy of CPWI-based fat quantitation in a phantom simulating fatty liver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters were set to conditions similar to those of the lineararray probe used in the phantom experiment. Ujihara et al 42) reported that the use of compound imaging with plane wave transmission was effective for envelope statistical analysis because the depth dependence of the acoustic field could be suppressed compared with the use of a focused beam. Therefore, we used the compound imaging by plane wave with transmission angles from - 10 to  10 at  2 intervals.…”
Section: Ultrasonic Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is useful for the noninvasive evaluation of diseases of various biological tissues, such as the liver, breast, lymph nodes, skin, and bone. In particular, amplitude envelope statistics, [1][2][3][4][5][6] attenuation coefficients, [7][8][9] backscatter coefficients (BSCs), [10][11][12][13][14] and elastography [15][16][17][18][19][20] have attracted attention in clinical practice, and tools for evaluating QUS parameters that were developed using these techniques have been implemented in clinical ultrasound systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%