2017
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2017.2712918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Single-Element Resistive Sensor-to-Microcontroller Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although peripherals can perform some actions simultaneously with the instruction execution done by the CPU, these are completely controlled by the CPU. In other words: the CPU decides when the peripheral starts its action and, once it is finished, the CPU is informed through an interruption [8], [9]; event detection through polling [10] is also possible but not suggested for low-power designs since the CPU is continuously checking the state of the peripherals. need to be done sequentially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although peripherals can perform some actions simultaneously with the instruction execution done by the CPU, these are completely controlled by the CPU. In other words: the CPU decides when the peripheral starts its action and, once it is finished, the CPU is informed through an interruption [8], [9]; event detection through polling [10] is also possible but not suggested for low-power designs since the CPU is continuously checking the state of the peripherals. need to be done sequentially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such simplicity means that this type of circuit is particularly suited for portable applications, where both the number of components and their consumption are very important. DICs are also highly versatile in terms of the PDDs used, allowing the use of both microcontrollers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) [11][12][13][14][15][16]. The calculation capabilities of a PDD connected to a DIC allow them to function as smart sensors, pre-processing information from the sensor and thus reducing the workload in subsequent high-level processing and decision stages [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are DICs for reading both capacitive and inductive sensors, those for resistive sensors have probably been the most widely used and analyzed in the literature, whether individually [3,7,18,19] or grouped in arrays [11,14]. Several issues need to be considered when designing a resistive DIC, such as accuracy, uncertainty, resolution [6,8,16,[20][21][22], and calibration points [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EADING sensors through a time-to-digital converter (TDC) instead of an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) has several advantages, for instance: (1) in microcontroller-based designs, the current consumption of an embedded TDC is clearly lower than that of an ADC; and (2) in integrated designs, the layout area occupied by a TDC is one or two orders of magnitude smaller than that required by an ADC. Accordingly, timer-based circuits for resistive [1]- [3], capacitive [4], [5], inductive [6], [7], and voltage-output [8], [9] sensors have been extensively analyzed and developed in the last decade. For the case of voltage-output sensors, usually it is assumed that the sensor provides a quasi-static analog output voltage [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%