2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Sterilization of Sensitive Biomaterials with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide at Low Temperature

Abstract: The development of bio-resorbable implant materials is rapidly going on. Sterilization of those materials is inevitable to assure the hygienic requirements for critical medical devices according to the medical device directive (MDD, 93/42/EG). Biopolymer-containing biomaterials are often highly sensitive towards classical sterilization procedures like steam, ethylene oxide treatment or gamma irradiation. Supercritical CO2 (scCO2) treatment is a promising strategy for the terminal sterilization of sensitive bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although decellularization shifted the mechanical properties of the affected pericardium towards those of the native valvular cusps, sterilization had a moderate effect in the opposing direction. Although the major method of sterilization, via sCO 2 , has been reported to not have a cross‐linking effect on biomaterials (Bernhardt et al, ; Hennessy et al, ), interesting compressive and tensile increases post‐treatment have been noted in studies utilizing this technique, as well as in the data at hand. Bernhardt et al () postulated that the high pressure utilized with sCO 2 sterilization may impact biomaterial nanostructure in unexpected manners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although decellularization shifted the mechanical properties of the affected pericardium towards those of the native valvular cusps, sterilization had a moderate effect in the opposing direction. Although the major method of sterilization, via sCO 2 , has been reported to not have a cross‐linking effect on biomaterials (Bernhardt et al, ; Hennessy et al, ), interesting compressive and tensile increases post‐treatment have been noted in studies utilizing this technique, as well as in the data at hand. Bernhardt et al () postulated that the high pressure utilized with sCO 2 sterilization may impact biomaterial nanostructure in unexpected manners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ETO can react with the free amine groups of collagen, affecting the mechanical properties of ECM bioscaffolds, and high-energy radiation damages protein chains and promotes the formation of free radicals (Proffen et al 2015). Supercritical CO 2 sterilization 10 has been investigated for sterilization of collagen scaffolds and showed minimal compromise of mechanical properties (Bernhardt et al 2015).…”
Section: Ecm Bioscaffold Sterilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Bernhardt et al . ). Other variations on scCO 2 have also been tested for inactivating spores of Bacillus species, including microbubbles of scCO 2 and scCO 2 treatment following a pulsed electric field treatment that sensitizes spores to scCO 2 (Ishikawa et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…,b; Bernhardt et al . ), conditions that alone are not especially damaging to drugs or devices. However, while such conditions can be efficient at inactivating growing bacteria of a variety of species, generally higher temperatures or pressures are needed to efficiently inactivate spores (Ishikawa et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%