1979
DOI: 10.21236/ada073724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Tactical Engagement Simulation Training Techniques: Two Training Programs for the Conduct of After Action Reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamentally varying nature of these training exercises and diverse unit roles have challenged the ARI to continuously evolve the AAR process with effectively applied methodologies (Bosley, Onoszko, Knerr, & Sulzen, 1979;Shlechter, Bessemer, Nesselroade, & Anthony, 1995;Word, 1987). Throughout its history, AAR methods needed to remain flexible enough to accommodate the fluid circumstances often occurring within the simulation, but rigid enough to avoid the "laissez--faire" model found threatening task improvements in earlier training methods (Gubler, 1997).…”
Section: The After Action Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamentally varying nature of these training exercises and diverse unit roles have challenged the ARI to continuously evolve the AAR process with effectively applied methodologies (Bosley, Onoszko, Knerr, & Sulzen, 1979;Shlechter, Bessemer, Nesselroade, & Anthony, 1995;Word, 1987). Throughout its history, AAR methods needed to remain flexible enough to accommodate the fluid circumstances often occurring within the simulation, but rigid enough to avoid the "laissez--faire" model found threatening task improvements in earlier training methods (Gubler, 1997).…”
Section: The After Action Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%