2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-018-0071-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved techniques for preparing eigenstates of fermionic Hamiltonians

Abstract: Modeling low energy eigenstates of fermionic systems can provide insight into chemical reactions and material properties and is one of the most anticipated applications of quantum computing. We present three techniques for reducing the cost of preparing fermionic Hamiltonian eigenstates using phase estimation. First, we report a polylogarithmic-depth quantum algorithm for antisymmetrizing the initial states required for simulation of fermions in first quantization. This is an exponential improvement over the p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could potentially revolutionize research in chemistry and material science by allowing a new mechanism for designing new materials, drugs, and catalysts. Accordingly, there is now a significant body of literature dedicated to developing new algorithms [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], tighter bounds and better implementation strategies [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], more desirable Hamiltonian representations [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and experimental demonstrations [40][41][42][43] for this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could potentially revolutionize research in chemistry and material science by allowing a new mechanism for designing new materials, drugs, and catalysts. Accordingly, there is now a significant body of literature dedicated to developing new algorithms [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], tighter bounds and better implementation strategies [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], more desirable Hamiltonian representations [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and experimental demonstrations [40][41][42][43] for this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VQE is advantageous for NISQ computers because of the short coherence times required compared to phase estimation [13]. Theoretical improvements of VQE to date have proposed methods to reduce the number of qubits and measurements required [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], and to improve the ansatz states [31,37,38], computation of gradients [39][40][41], and classical optimization techniques [42]. In the present paper we consider a separate issue: how quantum mechanical is this hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, for a given Hamiltonian?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been devoted to determining the most efficient implementation of the (controlled)-exp i  t -( )operation, using exact or approximate methods [19][20][21][22]. Alternatively, one may simulate  via a quantum walk, mapping the problem to phase estimating the unitary exp iarcsin  l -( ( ) ) for some λ, which may be implemented exactly [23][24][25][26]. In this work we do not consider such variations, but rather focus on the error in estimating the eigenvalue phases of the unitary U that is actually implemented on the quantum computer.…”
Section: Quantum Phase Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calculation of g(k) from these probabilities via equation (23) or equation (24), and (3) estimation of the phases f from g(k). Clearly (2) and (3) only need to be done once for the entire set of experiments.…”
Section: Classical Computation Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation