2009 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2009.5411670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved test method to verify the power rating of a photovoltaic (PV) project

Abstract: This paper reviews the PVUSA power rating method [1][2][3][4][5][6] and presents two additional methods that seek to improve this method in terms of model precision and increased seasonal applicability.It presents the results of an evaluation of each method based upon regression analysis of over 12 MW of operating photovoltaic (PV) systems located in a wide variety of climates. These systems include a variety of PV technologies, mounting configurations, and array sizes to ensure the conclusions are applicable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous authors have noted the seasonal differences in performance results from the PVUSA/ASTM capacity regressions [3]. To quantify the seasonal variation for each test, we calculated the standard deviation of the predicted and actual test results across all five months in the actual data (Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Seasonal Effects: Results and Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous authors have noted the seasonal differences in performance results from the PVUSA/ASTM capacity regressions [3]. To quantify the seasonal variation for each test, we calculated the standard deviation of the predicted and actual test results across all five months in the actual data (Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Seasonal Effects: Results and Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently released ASTM Standard E2848-11 [2] outlines a PV performance test approach based on the PVUSA rating methodology detailed in [3] and elsewhere. This test relies on the following multi-linear regression of AC power, P, to irradiance, I, ambient temperature, T a , and wind speed, WS:…”
Section: A Astm Standard E2848-11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties listed for PV reference cell irradiance measurements in Table 2 should be relatively easy to obtain as long as the PV reference cell is constructed from a stable, single junction (e.g., silicon) cell in a suitable package with a matched spectral response. In principle, PV matched reference cell measurement uncertainties of useable fuel for PV systems should not change with atmospheric conditions [3]. In all cases, the uncertainties listed assume that the measurements are implemented by a skilled individual using standard calibration protocols.…”
Section: Performance Measurement: Can Reference Cells Reduce the Uncementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power generation of a photovoltaic (PV) system may be documented by a capacity test [1,2] that quantifies the power output of the system at set conditions, such as an irradiance of 1000 W/m 2 , an ambient temperature of 20°C, and a wind speed of 1 m/s. A longer test must be used to verify the system performance under a range of conditions.…”
Section: Introduction: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%