2016 Fourth International Japan-Egypt Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JEC-ECC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/jec-ecc.2016.7518967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved text-independent speaker identification system for real time applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the FreqCNN model, i-vector and typical CNN models with three-fold cross-validation are given in Table 8. Compared with the traditional method [17] using MFCCs with vector quantization and gaussian mixture model, which obtains an accuracy of 91.00%, our model improves accuracy around +7% and obtains a UAR of 98.05% on average. We also tested i-vector and Table 5 Comparison of two ways of attention methods in CNNs and different numbers of attention-based blocks.…”
Section: Speaker Identificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the FreqCNN model, i-vector and typical CNN models with three-fold cross-validation are given in Table 8. Compared with the traditional method [17] using MFCCs with vector quantization and gaussian mixture model, which obtains an accuracy of 91.00%, our model improves accuracy around +7% and obtains a UAR of 98.05% on average. We also tested i-vector and Table 5 Comparison of two ways of attention methods in CNNs and different numbers of attention-based blocks.…”
Section: Speaker Identificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We further explored the performance of the model using a different number of frequencydistributed set and two attention methods. In the speaker identification task, we compared our model with the traditional method (i.e., MFCCs) [17] and typical CNN models. We also tested the FreqCNN model under different activation functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To reduce the number of speaker during a test stage, gender detection algorithm is used. Experimental results show that the suggested algorithm reduced the time testing to almost half 0.l0 51sec and gives 91% accuracy in comparison with VQ and GMM gives 88% and take 0.2242sec [15]. www.ijacsa.thesai.org They presented an automatic speaker identification system (SID) based on Gaussian Mixture Model and Support Vector Machines (GMM-SVM), where data set consist of 360 speakers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%