1984
DOI: 10.1049/el:19840583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved theoretical formula for the relationship between rain attenuation and depolarisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The U and V coefficients for a particular situation where experimental data are available can be found by (XPD, A) data pairs with a least-square error regression analysis on (1), where A is the rain attenuation. The ITU-R P.618-8 model [15], CHU model [16], Dissanyake et al model [17], Fukuchi et al model [18] and simple isolation model (SIM) [10] are used to predict the measured XPD. All models are of the form in (1), differing only in the functions used to represent U and V in terms of site and system parameters.…”
Section: Experimental Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The U and V coefficients for a particular situation where experimental data are available can be found by (XPD, A) data pairs with a least-square error regression analysis on (1), where A is the rain attenuation. The ITU-R P.618-8 model [15], CHU model [16], Dissanyake et al model [17], Fukuchi et al model [18] and simple isolation model (SIM) [10] are used to predict the measured XPD. All models are of the form in (1), differing only in the functions used to represent U and V in terms of site and system parameters.…”
Section: Experimental Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XPD of linear polarization can be related to that of circular polarization via a two-tier Gaussian model for rain. The expression of the linear polarization is given as The values for V can be obtained from Equation (8), l is the path length and the values for p and q are given in Table 2 of Fukuchi et al [18].…”
Section: Experimental Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F is the fraction of non-spherical raindrops, with a recommended value of 0.65.¸is the path length through rain in km. The values of the parameters S, C, D and < are shown in Table I for the models presented by E ITU-R [3]; E Dissanayake, Haworth, and Watson [4] (&DHW'); E Chu [5]; E Stutzman and Runyon [6] (&SR'); E Nowland, Olsen and Shkarofsky [7,8] (&NOS').…”
Section: Existing Models Of the Xpd}cpa Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stutzman and Runyon themselves used a Marshall}Palmer DSD and scattering coe$cients based on those from Uzunoglu, Evans and Holt, and came to a C of 17.3 for 10(f(30 GHz. Fukuchi et al [8] found from their calculations of scattering coe$cients of Pruppacher}Pitter-shaped raindrops a value for C of 26 for a Marshall}Palmer DSD (10(f(40 GHz), 20.5 for a Joss-thunderstorm DSD (10(f(30 GHz), and 30 for a Joss-drizzle DSD (13(f(40 GHz). Thus, it is found that, depending on the assumed drop size distribution, C can vary between about 17 and 30 for f between 10 and 30 GHz.…”
Section: Dependence On Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-polarization can be calculated theoretically, using the rainfall rate, the attenuation due to rain, the DSD, the forward scattering amplitude of the raindrops [13,14], the velocity of the rainfall [15], and the raindrop diameters [16]. Then, Fukuchi [17,18] improved Nowland's equation by using many DSDs, such as the MP DSD, the Joss thunderstorm DSD, and the Joss drizzle DSD, which they calculated up to 40 GHz. In this paper, in order to support the future use of a higher frequency band, we use a new DSD model to calculate the cross-polarization approximation up to 100 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%