2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-019-03724-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Tolerance of Lanthanum Nickelate (La2NiO4+δ) Cathodes to Chromium Poisoning Under Current Load in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Abstract: Lanthanum nickelate, La 2 NiO 4+d (LNO), is studied as a cathode material for use in solid oxide fuel cells with the objective of mitigating chromium poisoning. Under current load, both electrochemical and chemical reactions cause chromium poisoning, and high current density and humidity accelerate the poisoning. However, compared with a standard strontium-doped lanthanum manganite cathode, the LNO cathode has a much higher tolerance for chromium poisoning. This can be ascribed to a greatly reduced chromium de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Cr-tolerant cathodes are being actively investigated since no matter how much effort is made, volatile Cr species still cannot be removed from the heated cathode air. Among them, Ruddlesden–Popper-phase LaNiO 4+δ (LNO) shows strong Cr tolerance and relatively good electrochemical performance for cathode reaction. This Sr-free composition gives LNO strong tolerance to Cr deposition that proceeds through SrO-CrO 3 reaction. However, the performance of LNO is still not a match to LSCF in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Cr-tolerant cathodes are being actively investigated since no matter how much effort is made, volatile Cr species still cannot be removed from the heated cathode air. Among them, Ruddlesden–Popper-phase LaNiO 4+δ (LNO) shows strong Cr tolerance and relatively good electrochemical performance for cathode reaction. This Sr-free composition gives LNO strong tolerance to Cr deposition that proceeds through SrO-CrO 3 reaction. However, the performance of LNO is still not a match to LSCF in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that chromium deposition in LNO electrodes can occur by both chemical and electrochemical mechanisms, such as for the aforementioned LSM and LSCF electrodes. TEM‐EDX measurements have shown that during chemical deposition, chromium dissolves into the LaNiO 3 blocks of the La 2 NiO 4+ δ to form LaNi 0.7 Cr 0.3 O 3 57,58 . In Reference 58, it was determined that the Cr‐enrichment ratios increase with the distance from the triple‐phase boundaries, as opposed to LSM electrodes characterized by the predominant chromium deposition at the electrode ‐ electrolyte interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the chromium poisoning of LNO electrodes via the electrochemical mechanism is accelerated by the current density and humidity, as in the case of other electrode materials. In Reference 58, it was demonstrated that the amount of chromium that is evaporated from Crofer 22 H and deposited in the LNO electrode depends on the test conditions and increases: dry air + open circuit ~ dry air + 0.05 A cm −2 < dry air + 0.2 A cm −2 < 10% humidified air + 0.05 A cm −2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9] Therefore, the Sr-free K 2 NiF 4 -type rare-earth nickelates have been considered to be potentially more resilient to Cr-poisoning. So far, several Cr-poisoning studies on rare-earth nickelates have been published for La 2 NiO 4+δ [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and Nd 2 NiO 4+δ . [19][20][21][22][23] However, no such studies are available for Pr 2 NiO 4+δ , which is quite surprising, considering that Pr-nickelates show very high performance as SOEC/SOFC air electrodes matching current state-of-the-art materials like LSCF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%