2020
DOI: 10.3788/lop57.221003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved U-Net Based on Mixed Loss Function for Liver Medical Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Su and Fang 48 introduced a multichannel segmentation model that utilized gradient calculation to generate the training set, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.9429. Huang et al 49 proposed transposed-resize (TR) convolution, which minimized information loss during downsampling and introduced a new loss function, leading to a Dice coefficient of 0.9514. Aslani et al 17 achieving a Dice score of 0.9554 on our test set.…”
Section: Evaluation On Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su and Fang 48 introduced a multichannel segmentation model that utilized gradient calculation to generate the training set, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.9429. Huang et al 49 proposed transposed-resize (TR) convolution, which minimized information loss during downsampling and introduced a new loss function, leading to a Dice coefficient of 0.9514. Aslani et al 17 achieving a Dice score of 0.9554 on our test set.…”
Section: Evaluation On Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where x and y are denots as pixels of two pictures respectively, µ x and µ y are the mean values of x and y, and σ x and σ y are the standard deviations of x and y. C 1 is set to 0.022 and C 2 is set to 0.042 to prevent the denominator from being 0 [29]. When combined with these two loss functions, the details of the target portrait boundary can be optimized effectively in the segmentation process, thus improving the overall segmentation accuracy of the model.…”
Section: Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%