2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-018-0853-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved versions of rice maintainer line, APMS 6B, possessing two resistance genes, Xa21 and Xa38, exhibit high level of resistance to bacterial blight disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the results suggest that the gene combinations containing the Xa21 gene were most resistant, as evidenced by shorter lesions lengths, followed by Xa4 + Xa21, Xa7 + Xa21 and xa13 + Xa21, while lines with Xa4 + xa5, xa5 + xa13 and Xa7 + xa13 were less effective. These results are consistent with previous studies, which have shown the presence of Xa21 to be correlated with high levels of persistent resistance against BB disease in rice [6,14,15,17,25]. Xa21 is the cell surface receptor, kinase, which is able to provide resistance to Xoo infections; Xa21 not only suppresses Xoo growth, but also triggers broad perturbation in rice transcriptomes and mediated signaling pathways, preventing Xoo infections [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the results suggest that the gene combinations containing the Xa21 gene were most resistant, as evidenced by shorter lesions lengths, followed by Xa4 + Xa21, Xa7 + Xa21 and xa13 + Xa21, while lines with Xa4 + xa5, xa5 + xa13 and Xa7 + xa13 were less effective. These results are consistent with previous studies, which have shown the presence of Xa21 to be correlated with high levels of persistent resistance against BB disease in rice [6,14,15,17,25]. Xa21 is the cell surface receptor, kinase, which is able to provide resistance to Xoo infections; Xa21 not only suppresses Xoo growth, but also triggers broad perturbation in rice transcriptomes and mediated signaling pathways, preventing Xoo infections [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Conventional backcross breeding is the primary method used to develop highly BB-resistant rice cultivars, but it cannot accurately transfer multiple genes into the cultivar by phenotypic screening and the process requires a significant amount of time [21,22]. Modified backcross pyramid breeding, combined with molecular marker-assisted selection, has already been demonstrated to increase the precision and efficiency of breeding [23][24][25]. Due to the relatively large amount of work involved with the MAS process, the conventional backcross breeding approach has been widely adopted in breeding programs designed to breed for BB resistance [10,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GU-2 is a Near Isogenic Line of APMS6B, developed through marker assisted backcross breeding of two bacterial blight resistance genes viz., Xa21 and Xa38 to confer broad spectrum resistance to bacterial blight (Yugander et al 2018) and has medium slender grain and excellent cooking quality which was used as donor parent for bacterial leaf blight disease. The parental lines viz., APMS6B, GU-2, RPHR 1005 (male parent of DRRH-3) and hybrid DRRH-3 were intolerant to low soil P.…”
Section: Donor For Bacterial Blightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither the CMS line (APMS6B) and the restorer line (RPHR 1005) nor does the derived hybrid (DRRH-3) acquire tolerance to low phosphorus and resistance to BB. In previous study, the improved maintainer line APMS6B of DRRH-3 known as GU-2, was developed by incorporating two bacterial leaf blight (BB) resistance genes (Xa21 and Xa38), through marker assisted backcross breeding (MABB) approach (Yugander et al 2018). The scope of marker-assisted breeding for targeted introgression of BB resistance genes (Yugander et al 2018;Sundaram et al 2008;Amante-Bordeos et al 1992;Hittalmani et al 2000) and Pup1 (Swamy et al 2020;Anila et al 2018;Chin et al 2011;Chithrameenal et al 2018) has been successfully demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation