2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-7-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement and decline of cognitive function in schizophrenia over one year: a longitudinal investigation using latent growth modelling

Abstract: Background: Long-term follow-up studies of people with schizophrenia report stability of cognitive performance; less is known about any shorter-term changes in cognitive function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive disturbances are considered to be a core feature of schizophrenia and include deficits in visuospatial recognition (Barnett et al . 2007; O’Donnell et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive disturbances are considered to be a core feature of schizophrenia and include deficits in visuospatial recognition (Barnett et al . 2007; O’Donnell et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A longitudinal investigation of cognitive function in schizophrenia over 1 year reported a decline in spatial recognition but not in pattern recognition or motor speed, using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) as part of the CUtLASS trials. In that study cognitive changes were present in schizophrenia patients but the magnitude of change was small compared with differences in cognitive measures that existed between patients [28]. A recent study assessed stability of cognition and its relation to functional outcome over a 1-year test-retest interval in 128 schizophrenia outpatients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drop out rates on the order of 25–30% are not unusual in longitudinal studies with community participants (6, 40). Studies involving severely ill patient populations have published data losses as high as 42–74% (41, 42). Our rate, however, is a little high when compared to the reported 17–21% drop out rates in similar quasi-experimental studies of participants with cardiovascular disease (17, 22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%