2012
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement in corneal scarring following bacterial keratitis

Abstract: Aim Bacterial keratitis results in corneal scarring and subsequent visual impairment. The long-term evolution of corneal scars has not been well described. In this case series, we identified patients who had improvement in corneal scarring and visual acuity from a clinical trial for bacterial keratitis. Methods We searched the records of the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT) for patients who had improvement in vision between the 3-month and 12-month visits and reviewed their clinical photographs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corneal scar removal is limited by the depth and regularity of the lesion. McClintic and colleagues have recently shown that scars from corneal ulcers continue to improve many months after initial infection. There have also been contemporary studies highlighting that optical coherence tomography‐guided transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy can result in excellent visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with anterior corneal scars .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corneal scar removal is limited by the depth and regularity of the lesion. McClintic and colleagues have recently shown that scars from corneal ulcers continue to improve many months after initial infection. There have also been contemporary studies highlighting that optical coherence tomography‐guided transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy can result in excellent visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with anterior corneal scars .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, ulcers in general may take more than 3 months to reach their visual potential. 17 SCUT was designed with a 12-month follow-up visit to examine such longer term effects. Here, we present the 12-month clinical outcomes of this trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations evaluating strategies to decrease corneal scar formation after treatment of infectious keratitis are currently in progress; SCUT is representative of these efforts. 4 7 , 24 , 25 According to recent reports, the primary outcome of this trial revealed no benefit of adjunctive corticosteroids at 3 months after enrollment. Despite a possible delay in epithelial healing, no harm was observed with the use of corticosteroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“… 4 6 In SCUT, corneal scarring resulting from bacterial keratitis was noted to improve over time with corticosteroid treatment; the density of the scar-related opacity improved, leading to a concurrent improvement in vision. 7 However, corticosteroids may also significantly slow the process of corneal wound healing, prolong infection, and predispose to stromal thinning and perforation. 6 8 Therefore, treatments to reduce corneal scar formation without adverse effects, such as delayed re-epithelialization or perforation, are sought.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%