2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-014-0153-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Brassica napus via interspecific hybridization between B. napus and B. oleracea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Riaz et al (2001) evaluated 12 hybrids involving parents from different genetic diversity groups and reported highest MPH and high-parent heterosis for the hybrids that involved a parental line derived from a B. napus × B. oleracea cross that was developed by Quazi (1988). Recently, Li et al (2014) Radoev et al (2008) found mainly dominance and overdominance effects of the genes contributing to heterosis. The low seed yield in the IN inbred population was apparently attributable to introduction of several unfavorable alleles from B. oleracea, and this is not very uncommon for the inbred lines derived from interspecific crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Riaz et al (2001) evaluated 12 hybrids involving parents from different genetic diversity groups and reported highest MPH and high-parent heterosis for the hybrids that involved a parental line derived from a B. napus × B. oleracea cross that was developed by Quazi (1988). Recently, Li et al (2014) Radoev et al (2008) found mainly dominance and overdominance effects of the genes contributing to heterosis. The low seed yield in the IN inbred population was apparently attributable to introduction of several unfavorable alleles from B. oleracea, and this is not very uncommon for the inbred lines derived from interspecific crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated the value of utilizing allelic diversity of the allied Brassica species for increased heterosis in B. napus (Qian et al, 2005;Li et al, 2006;Zou et al, 2010;Girke et al, 2011Girke et al, , 2012Jesske et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014). For example, Zou et al (2010) observed a high level of heterosis in test hybrids while using germplasm diversified with the A genome of B. rapa and the C genome of B. carinata.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genus Brassica , consisting of six species, including B. napus , is comprised of A, B and C basic genomes, which can be divided into different subgenomes (A r /A n /A j , C n /C o /C c and B j /B c /B n ), and harbours rich variation not only among the genomes but also among the subgenomes (Chalhoub et al ., ; Cheng et al ., ; Liu et al ., ; Navabi et al ., ; Parkin et al ., ; Pires et al ., ; Warwick et al ., ; Yang et al ., ; Zou et al ., ). To utilize the variation among the different basic genomes and different subgenomes to broaden the genetic diversity of B. napus , many studies have introgressed genomic regions from a single related species and even other genera, such as B. rapa (Qian et al ., ), B. oleracea (Li et al ., ; Quazi, ), Brassica juncea (Roy, ), B. carinata (Navabi et al ., , ), Brassica maurorum (Chrungu et al ., ), Sinapis arvensis (Hu et al ., ) and Isatis indigotica (Kang et al ., ). In addition, substantial efforts have been extended to resynthesize B. napus by combining the genomes from two or more species, such as crossing B. rapa with B. oleracea (Becker et al ., ; Hansen and Earle, ; Nagaharu, ), B. juncea with B. carinata (Chatterjee et al ., ), and B. carinata with B. rapa (Li et al ., , ; Xiao et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytological relationships and genomic homology among the species provide a major opportunity to generate novel Brassica germplasms, or even novel species, such as Brassica hexaploids, via interspecific hybridization in Brassica (Chen et al, 2011; Mason and Batley, 2015). To improve the major rapeseed species, B. napus , extensive and successful efforts have been made to broaden the genetic basis, and introduce several specific traits from related species (Prakash and Raut, 1983; Meng et al, 1998; Ren et al, 2000; Xiao et al, 2010; Girke et al, 2012a,b; Li et al, 2014). Utilizing the subgenomic differentiation within and between Brassica species would also be helpful to broaden the genetic base of B. juncea and explore inter-subgenomic heterosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%