2015
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-8631-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of climate predictions and reduction of their uncertainties using learning algorithms

Abstract: Abstract. Simulated climate dynamics, initialized with observed conditions, is expected to be synchronized, for several years, with the actual dynamics. However, the predictions of climate models are not sufficiently accurate. Moreover, there is a large variance between simulations initialized at different times and between different models. One way to improve climate predictions and to reduce the associated uncertainties is to use an ensemble of climate model predictions, weighted according to their past perf… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The skill of the sequential learning algorithms (SLAs) is first examined in the context of deterministic or point‐based skill, as in prior applications of the algorithms for climate prediction (e.g., Strobach and Bel 2015; 2016; 2020). As a subsequent step, the skill improvements of the methods are assessed in a probabilistic context, considering all the quantiles in “Qgrid”.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The skill of the sequential learning algorithms (SLAs) is first examined in the context of deterministic or point‐based skill, as in prior applications of the algorithms for climate prediction (e.g., Strobach and Bel 2015; 2016; 2020). As a subsequent step, the skill improvements of the methods are assessed in a probabilistic context, considering all the quantiles in “Qgrid”.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each mixture was applied using all predictors (denoted as BOA, EGA) and the NWP‐based predictors only (denoted as BOA_NWP and EGA_NWP) in order to assess the presence of any added value from including reanalysis‐based information in the forecasts. The EGA method was implemented to benchmark the results against prior uses of sequential learning algorithms in climate prediction (e.g., Strobach and Bel 2015; 2016; 2020), but it has been considered here with several improvements with respect to its prior uses: EGA is trained for each qi in “Qgrid” using a 2‐year training period and optimizing a fixed learning rate across quantiles over this period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties from both the prediction model and long-range meteorological forecasts need to be quantified. The uncertainty from long-range meteorological forecasts is likely larger [85][86][87]. It is conceivable that the global fire outlook forecast becomes an important part of a long-range meteorological forecast service as the quality of long-range meteorological forecast products improves, the forecast period becomes longer, and the nonlinear forecast model improves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to demonstrate the generality of the methods presented here, we used both an equally weighted ensemble and a weighted ensemble for which the weights were generated by a learning algorithm. The learning algorithm that we used is the Exponentiated Gradient Average (EGA) (Cesa‐Bianchi & Lugosi, ; Kivinen & Warmuth, ) that was shown to outperform the equally weighted ensemble in decadal climate predictions (Strobach & Bel, , ). The learning algorithm used the first 10 years of the simulations to assign weights to the different models, and those weights were then used to generate the predictions for the following 20 years of the simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%