2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404703101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation

Abstract: Accurate high-resolution refinement of protein structure models is a formidable challenge because of the delicate balance of forces in the native state, the difficulty in sampling the very large number of alternative tightly packed conformations, and the inaccuracies in current force fields. Indeed, energy-based refinement of comparative models generally leads to degradation rather than improvement in model quality, and, hence, most current comparative modeling procedures omit physically based refinement. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, our ultimate goal is not just to reproduce the B-factors, but rather, through doing so, to learn as much as possible about the internal motions of proteins. A good understanding of protein dynamics may have many significant implications, from structure predictions [14] to decoding the mechanism of how some proteins realize their functions [15].…”
Section: Validity Of Gnm Modes: a Comparison With Random Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, our ultimate goal is not just to reproduce the B-factors, but rather, through doing so, to learn as much as possible about the internal motions of proteins. A good understanding of protein dynamics may have many significant implications, from structure predictions [14] to decoding the mechanism of how some proteins realize their functions [15].…”
Section: Validity Of Gnm Modes: a Comparison With Random Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 In another interesting approach, dimensionality reduction was utilized in comparative protein modeling to avoid false attractors in force-field based optimization by using evolutionary information to reduce the number of degrees of freedom for structure refinement. 31 In addition to decreasing the complexity required for modeling flexibility in molecular structure, dimensionality reduction can be used to analyze the extensive data generated from simulation into intuitive results. By lowering the number of effective degrees of freedom, more meaningful visualizations might be obtained and undesirable effects from the so-called "curse of dimensionality" can be removed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that applying ISVD to increase the number of aminoacids taken into account in the core of the alignment could be advantageously used in the field of homology modeling, were SVD has been demonstrated to be useful (Qian et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the deformations follow the main trends in the superfamily and it is guaranteed that they are evolutionary/ biologically meaningful. The idea comes from recent development in homology modeling (Qian et al, 2004). We apply the deformations so that they are also chemically correct, meeting the constrains in bond length and torsion angles, using an articulated model: The secondary structure elements (SSEs) of the domain are moved as rigid bodies and the loops are closed with the cyclic coordinate descent (CCD) algorithm (Canutescu and Dunbrack, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%