2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of damage-assessment results using high-spatial density measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Techniques such as Global Shape Correlation function (GSC), Global Amplitude Correlation function (GAC), the first Global Amplitude Correlation function (AIGSC) and the second Global Amplitude Correlation function (AIGAC) (Zang and Imregun, 2001;Zang et al, 2003), Frequency Response Assurance Criterion (FRAC) (Heylen and Lammens, 1996), Frequency Domain Assurance Criterion (FDAC) and Response Vector Assurance Criterion (RVAC) (Pascual et al, 1997(Pascual et al, , 1999, and Frequency response curvature method (Palacz and Krawczuk, 2002) use the difference between damaged and undamaged FRF structures to locate or to estimate damage (Sinou, 2013). Owolabi et al (2003) and Kin and Stubbs (2003) utilised measured dynamic responses of damaged beams to detect the presence of a crack and to determine its location and size.…”
Section: Damage Detection Via Explicit Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as Global Shape Correlation function (GSC), Global Amplitude Correlation function (GAC), the first Global Amplitude Correlation function (AIGSC) and the second Global Amplitude Correlation function (AIGAC) (Zang and Imregun, 2001;Zang et al, 2003), Frequency Response Assurance Criterion (FRAC) (Heylen and Lammens, 1996), Frequency Domain Assurance Criterion (FDAC) and Response Vector Assurance Criterion (RVAC) (Pascual et al, 1997(Pascual et al, , 1999, and Frequency response curvature method (Palacz and Krawczuk, 2002) use the difference between damaged and undamaged FRF structures to locate or to estimate damage (Sinou, 2013). Owolabi et al (2003) and Kin and Stubbs (2003) utilised measured dynamic responses of damaged beams to detect the presence of a crack and to determine its location and size.…”
Section: Damage Detection Via Explicit Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%