2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-014-0303-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of dynamic response in an impact absorber by frictional elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leakage rate, which directly indicates the state of a sealing structure, is difficult to determine due to the small scale and complicated structure of sealing channels. Trial-and-error experimentation [33][34][35] is a commonly used method for overcoming these challenges, but it is costly and time-consuming, and the results obtained may not be directly applicable. In addition, leakage models based on test results often fail to reveal the effect of different factors on sealing performance because of the number of factors involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leakage rate, which directly indicates the state of a sealing structure, is difficult to determine due to the small scale and complicated structure of sealing channels. Trial-and-error experimentation [33][34][35] is a commonly used method for overcoming these challenges, but it is costly and time-consuming, and the results obtained may not be directly applicable. In addition, leakage models based on test results often fail to reveal the effect of different factors on sealing performance because of the number of factors involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcoming the immaturity and the lack of design direction requires an effective leakage prediction model [6,25,26], especially in the conceptual design phase. Many researchers have developed leakage prediction models based on experimental methods [27][28][29]. However, because test results include the contribution of several factors, empirical models often have difficulty in establishing quantitative relationships between individual factors and leakage amount, and thus it may be difficult to use them to extrapolate to severe service conditions or after long-term operation, unless the test conditions themselves are relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, fue sometido a pruebas de impacto cíclico con un mecanismo manivela, biela, corredera a una determinada frecuencia de trabajo, con el fin de cuantificar la cantidad de energía que este dispositivo es capaz de disipar. Se ha analizado numérica y experimentalmente la forma en que el prototipo disipa energía a través de sus distintos elementos (vástago, aros deformables, carcasa) y la influencia de las interacciones de contacto entre superficies [20], [21] . Se encontró que el dispositivo es capaz de disipar cerca del 88 % de energía en un evento de impacto y, además, puede disipar energía por varios ciclos, de ahí que el dispositivo presente características de un amortiguador y sea capaz de atenuar las vibraciones en sistemas mecánicos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified