2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-12058-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of emotion recognition from facial images using deep learning and early stopping cross validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies in Facial Expressions Recognition (FER) and Pain Assessment have introduced multiple cutting-edge models that achieve an acceptable performance. These models have tackled various challenges related to performance improvement by leveraging state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [17,18] or by adopting Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [19]. Moreover, researchers have explored the impact of various techniques such as augmentation [20] and batch normalization [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies in Facial Expressions Recognition (FER) and Pain Assessment have introduced multiple cutting-edge models that achieve an acceptable performance. These models have tackled various challenges related to performance improvement by leveraging state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [17,18] or by adopting Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [19]. Moreover, researchers have explored the impact of various techniques such as augmentation [20] and batch normalization [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most studies focus on improving recognition accuracy, challenges such as poses, occlusion, and illumination demand further investigation and more efficient solutions. In order to compare the SAFEPA with the state-of-the-art, we have selected four recent studies [17,[24][25][26] that use CNN, HOG, and LBP for FER on the same datasets as our study. Additionally, we included three more recent studies that focus on facial expression-based pain assessment [3,22,23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the generalizability of the proposed LEmo method, we choose two different datasets; i) CK+ and ii) KDEF. These datasets are chosen as they have recently been used in a wide number of studies [57,58,59,60,61].…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted features are used as inputs for the three classifiers, namely, SVM, KNN and decision tree (DT). In this study, to objectively highlight the performance of our procedure, we assess classification performance using three evaluation metrics, namely accuracy, sensitivity and specificity [9][10].…”
Section: • Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics are complementary and summarize the performance of a classifier by taking into account all the components of the confusion matrix. The latter is composed of 4 values (Table I) in the case of a two-class classification issue (positive class vs. negative class) [9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%