“…Mechanical foam breaker is preferable to chemical methods, avoiding problems such as changing the chemical and physical properties of the foam system which pollute the foam surfactant and reduce its foamability that the foam drilling fluid cannot be reused, or adverse effects on environment seen when foaming is controlled by the addition of antifoam agents (Pelton, 2002). A number of mechanical foam breakers have so far been proposed including high rotate centrifugal foam breaker (Vetoshkin, 2003), foambreaking cyclones (Guzman, 2005) and air jet breaker (Vetoshkin and Chagin, 2002), etc., (Satoshi et al, 2003;Takesono et al, 2006;Zagoskina and Sokovnin, 2001;Barigou, 2001;Satoshi et al, 2007;Deshpande and Barigou, 2000). However, most of these breakers are hardly practical for foam-breaking operation in high-rate gas bubbling systems of foam drilling fluid.…”