2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of fracture toughness of Ti+Nb stabilized microalloyed and interstitial free steels processed through single phase regime control multiaxial forging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a displays a load vs. displacement curve of the MAFed MA and IF steel specimens. The values of apparent fracture toughness could be estimated by calculating the conditional fracture toughness (KQ), equivalent energy fracture toughness (Kee) and Jintegral (crack initiation energy) using the standard equations reported in ref [4]. The values of KQ, Kee and J-integral of the both the MA (KQ Kee, and J values are 78.5, 90 and 97.2MPa√m, respectively) and the IF steel specimens (KQ Kee, and J values are 78.3, 97 and 109MPa√m, respectively) were noticed to increase significantly following the multiaxial forging, as compared to the annealed specimens.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4a displays a load vs. displacement curve of the MAFed MA and IF steel specimens. The values of apparent fracture toughness could be estimated by calculating the conditional fracture toughness (KQ), equivalent energy fracture toughness (Kee) and Jintegral (crack initiation energy) using the standard equations reported in ref [4]. The values of KQ, Kee and J-integral of the both the MA (KQ Kee, and J values are 78.5, 90 and 97.2MPa√m, respectively) and the IF steel specimens (KQ Kee, and J values are 78.3, 97 and 109MPa√m, respectively) were noticed to increase significantly following the multiaxial forging, as compared to the annealed specimens.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 presents an outline of the MAF processing schedule, whereas a detailed account of the experimental parameters are reported in ref [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), and K H is the Hall-Petch (HP) constant. K H is reported to be 0.11e0.31 MN m À3/2 [27,42,43]. In this study, we have taken this value as 0.3 MN m À3/2 .…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, M is the Taylor factor (3 for non-textured polycrystalline materials), G is the shear modulus (82 GPa) [27], a ~0.3 is a constant [42,43], b is the Burgers vector, and r d is the dislocation density.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%