2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.18.23290080
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of language function after Contralateral Seventh Cervical Nerve Transfer in hemiplegic patients combined with post-stroke aphasia: a prospective observational cohort study

Abstract: Background While the contralateral seventh cervical nerve (CC7) cross transfer was designed to reconstruct paralyzed arm function after stroke, improvement in language function was found in patients combined with aphasia. Objective To evaluate the effect of improvement in language function after CC7 cross transfer in stroke patients with chronic aphasia and explore its potential mechanism. Methods In a prospective observative cohort, patients diagnosed with hemiplegia combined with aphasia were included. The l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 42 patients who presented with right spastic arm paralysis combined with aphasia. Among them, 20 patients that met the eligibility were included in this study (four more patients compared to preprint version, which was an early but partial report; Feng et al, 2023), while 22 patients were excluded due to their inability to cooperate with evaluations, having suffered from more than one stroke or traumatic brain injury since the onset of aphasia or having lesions at bilateral hemispheres.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 42 patients who presented with right spastic arm paralysis combined with aphasia. Among them, 20 patients that met the eligibility were included in this study (four more patients compared to preprint version, which was an early but partial report; Feng et al, 2023), while 22 patients were excluded due to their inability to cooperate with evaluations, having suffered from more than one stroke or traumatic brain injury since the onset of aphasia or having lesions at bilateral hemispheres.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%