Improvement of Multiclass Classification of Pavement Objects Using Intensity and Range Images

Abstract

Automated recognition of road surface objects is vital for efficient and reliable road condition assessment. Despite recent advances in developing computer vision algorithms, it is still challenging to analyze road images due to the low contrast, background noises, object diversity, and variety of lighting conditions. Motivated by the need for an improved pavement objects classification, we present Dual Attention Convolutional Neural Network (DACNN) to improve the performance of multiclass classification using intensity and range images collected with 3D laser imaging devices. DACNN fuses heterogeneous information in intensity and range images to enhance distinguishing foreground from background, as well as to improve object classification in noisy images under various illumination conditions. DACNN also leverages multiscale input images by capturing contextual information for object classification with different sizes and shapes. DACNN contains an attention mechanism that (i) considers semantic interdependencies in spatial and channel dimensions and (ii) adaptively fuses scale-specific and mode-specific features so that each feature has its own level of contribution to the final decision. As a practical engineering project, dataset are collected from road surfaces using 3D laser imaging. DACNN is compared with four deep classifiers that are widely used in transportation applications. Experiments show that DACNN consistently outperforms the baselines by 22–35% on average in terms of the F-score. A comprehensive discussion is also presented regarding computational costs and how robustly the investigated classifiers perform on each road object.

Effect of Crumb Rubber on the Moisture and Rutting Behavior of Low-Energy Asphalt and Determining the Best Flow Number Model

“…In addition, other statistical analyses can be incorporated with the proposed approaches [54][55][56]. Various modeling methods and algorithms are recommended for further investigation in the continuation of this research [57][58][59]. Diferent validation methods are recommended in this regard [60,61].…”