2021
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.156458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Outcome by Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Gynecologic/ Oncology Surgery

Abstract: Background: Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) are evidence-based protocols designed to improve functional rehabilitation after surgery. They lead to improvement in patient outcomes while reducing length of hospital stay. Objective: This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes between women undergoing major gynecologic surgeries before and after implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Patients and Methods: This erective observational study was carried out on patients attending to Zag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On other hand, the results are contrary to Sarhan et al (2021) who stated that, mean ±SD of age was higher in both studied groups which distributed as 51.25 ± 16.1 and 56.55 ± 11.94 years in the study and control groups, respectively. In the researchers’ point of view, the little observed difference in the current study findings and the other studies could be attributed to the variations in sample size and its selection criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On other hand, the results are contrary to Sarhan et al (2021) who stated that, mean ±SD of age was higher in both studied groups which distributed as 51.25 ± 16.1 and 56.55 ± 11.94 years in the study and control groups, respectively. In the researchers’ point of view, the little observed difference in the current study findings and the other studies could be attributed to the variations in sample size and its selection criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the current research were supported by Sarhan et al (2021) who reported that, the mean length of hospital stay was 38.29 ± 4.95 h in the study group and 68.44 ± 6.5 h in the control group with significant difference between the two groups. This finding is also similar to Sibbern et al (2017) who studied “Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery” founded that more than half of the studied women stayed from 1 to 3 days in hospital compared to the control group with 4–5 days mean duration of hospitalization, the study group was significantly shorter than those in control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…There were challenges in adhering to the recommended protocols (n = 5) (19,21,27,28,30). Limitations in research design and methodologies compromising the ability to generate strong evidence were acknowledged (n = 3) (27)(28)(29). A lack of trained staff (n = 2) (21,23), patient education (n = 1) (28), and multidisciplinary collaboration (n = 3) (22,28,30), were also reported as challenges to optimize ERAS effectiveness.…”
Section: B Reportedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported clinical outcomes of ERAS implementation include a reduction in hospital length of stay (n = 12) (16, 17,19-22, 24, 25, 28-31), lower mortality rates (n = 3)(17,19, 26), lower pain scores and improved pain management (n = 7)(20)(21)(22)(26)(27)(28)(29), and a decrease in hospital re-admissions (n = 2)(19, 28). Implementation was also associated with a decrease in morbidity (n = 6)(17,20, 26, 28,30,31), and an increase in early mobility (n = 4)(22,(26)(27)(28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%