2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9608-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of RNA Simulations with Torsional Revisions of the AMBER Force Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2016, we proposed a reoptimized set of parameters for Ψ that provided a much improved description for the glycosidic torsion distribution along with a satisfactory description of the pucker distribution . For unmodified RNA, it was reported that incorporation of revised χ and α/γ torsional parameters results in significant improvements in the description of single-stranded RNA tetramers. , Unfortunately, for pseudouridine and its derivatives, the revised glycosidic torsion parameters χ YIL or χ OL3 corresponding to uridine are not applicable. In view of this, the parameter sets for modified RNA residues, developed by Santa Lucia Jr. and co-workers, which are now part of the distribution of the molecular modeling suite AMBER, cannot be used for pseudouridine and its derivatives in combination with the recommended χ OL3 correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, we proposed a reoptimized set of parameters for Ψ that provided a much improved description for the glycosidic torsion distribution along with a satisfactory description of the pucker distribution . For unmodified RNA, it was reported that incorporation of revised χ and α/γ torsional parameters results in significant improvements in the description of single-stranded RNA tetramers. , Unfortunately, for pseudouridine and its derivatives, the revised glycosidic torsion parameters χ YIL or χ OL3 corresponding to uridine are not applicable. In view of this, the parameter sets for modified RNA residues, developed by Santa Lucia Jr. and co-workers, which are now part of the distribution of the molecular modeling suite AMBER, cannot be used for pseudouridine and its derivatives in combination with the recommended χ OL3 correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, AMBER (used also for all the applications shown here) was substantially improved [ 21 ] (i) by refining the backbone and glycosidic torsion parameters [ 65 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ]; (ii) by finely tuning the van der Waals parameters of nucleobase atoms [ 73 ]; (iii) by refining electrostatic, torsional, and van der Waals parameters of atoms other than those in (ii) [ 74 , 75 , 76 ]; (iv) by using the advanced water FFs, such as the TIP4P–D water model [ 77 ]; Although this may not be sufficient to significantly improve the performance of the FFs [ 21 ], the choice of water model affects accuracy in the prediction of experimental data such as NMR data [ 78 ]; and (v) by developing accurate nonbonded parameters for hydrogen bonding [ 79 , 80 ], which include induced polarization [ 64 ]. All of these improvements have succeeded in boosting RNA AMBER FF toward a predictive power approaching that of MD proteins [ 64 , 81 ].…”
Section: Targeting Rna Trinucleotide Repeat Expansions: Htt Rna Cagmentioning
confidence: 99%