2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of tensile and flexural properties of 3D printed PEEK through the increase of interfacial adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tensile test specimens were designed and dimensioned following the specifications from ASTM D638 [ 48 ] for specimen type IV, as illustrated in Figure 1 . The G-code printing file was generated using the software Simplify3D (v4.1.2, Simplify3D, Blue Ash, OH, USA) with the specimen built flat on the print bed, and the printing parameters were selected based on parameter optimisation results for tensile strength from a previous work [ 46 ]. Additionally, to avoid discontinuities in the cross-section reduction area of the specimen with the rectilinear deposition ( Figure 2 a), the concentric deposition strategy was used, which is a pattern that also aligns the deposited lines with the specimen tensile loading ( Figure 2 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tensile test specimens were designed and dimensioned following the specifications from ASTM D638 [ 48 ] for specimen type IV, as illustrated in Figure 1 . The G-code printing file was generated using the software Simplify3D (v4.1.2, Simplify3D, Blue Ash, OH, USA) with the specimen built flat on the print bed, and the printing parameters were selected based on parameter optimisation results for tensile strength from a previous work [ 46 ]. Additionally, to avoid discontinuities in the cross-section reduction area of the specimen with the rectilinear deposition ( Figure 2 a), the concentric deposition strategy was used, which is a pattern that also aligns the deposited lines with the specimen tensile loading ( Figure 2 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue tests were performed on the 3D-printed PEEK specimens under load-controlled conditions for three different stress levels. For each level, the maximum stress applied ( ) corresponded to 75%, 85%, and 95% of the tensile strength of 86.7 MPa that was previously determined using similar 3D-printed PEEK specimens [ 46 ]. Moreover, a representative engineering stress–strain curve obtained in a monotonic tensile test is provided in Figure 3 [ 46 ], where it can be seen that the tensile strength is almost coincident with the yield stress for PEEK, as in accordance with the ASTM D638 standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of thin-walled objects, it can be difficult to measure surface roughness, waviness, or form errors [19] using contact or optical measuring instruments. The results of bending tests of models produced by 3D printing in the FDM/FFF technology have been presented in several research papers [20][21][22], where the authors focused their attention on samples with a standard thickness of over 3 mm, usually with full filling. Moreover, papers [20,21] present the results of bending tests for materials based on composites and paper [22] for PEEK material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of bending tests of models produced by 3D printing in the FDM/FFF technology have been presented in several research papers [20][21][22], where the authors focused their attention on samples with a standard thickness of over 3 mm, usually with full filling. Moreover, papers [20,21] present the results of bending tests for materials based on composites and paper [22] for PEEK material. These works, however, do not address the issue of generating G-codes because this problem arises, as shown in this article, only in the case of thin-walled models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%