1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00178-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the Streptomyces griseus method for degradable protein in ruminant feeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intestinal digestibility of RUP was estimated via a three‐step enzymatic in vitro method (Hippenstiel, Kivitz, Benninghoff, & Südekum, ). Basically, the method corresponds to Calsamiglia and Stern (), except that ruminal incubation was replaced by application of Streptomyces griseus protease (Licitra et al., ). True protein content was determined according to Licitra et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intestinal digestibility of RUP was estimated via a three‐step enzymatic in vitro method (Hippenstiel, Kivitz, Benninghoff, & Südekum, ). Basically, the method corresponds to Calsamiglia and Stern (), except that ruminal incubation was replaced by application of Streptomyces griseus protease (Licitra et al., ). True protein content was determined according to Licitra et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro protease procedures used in this study were similar to those described by Krishnamoorthy et al (1983), Licitra et al (1998), and Coblentz et al (1999) Streptomyces griseus protease (P‐5147; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) contained 4.5 enzyme activity units per milligram of solid, where one activity unit of enzyme was able to hydrolyze casein to produce color equivalent to 1.0 μmol (181μg) of tyrosine per minute at pH 7.5 and 37°C. Sample size for all incubations was set on the basis of a common N content (15 mg) within each incubation flask; therefore, the actual sample weight was adjusted for CP concentration, and varied somewhat across forages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the in situ procedure (Vanzant et al, 1998), corrected for microbial contaminant N, is the most common method used for evaluating relative proportions of RDP and RUP in ruminant feedstuffs; however, in vitro procedures that utilize semipurified proteolytic enzymes have been developed as routine laboratory techniques for the estimation of these protein fractions in forages (Krishnamoorthy et al, 1983; Licitra et al, 1998; Coblentz et al, 1999). Generally, single‐endpoint enzymatic techniques can more easily accommodate the sample numbers generated from plot‐type studies than full time‐course kinetic evaluations by in situ methodologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quadratic terms of the main effects tested also influenced the enzymatic RUP determination within different feed categories. Concerning CONC, it was decided to test increasing concentrations of S. griseus protease and to express them as U for ml in 10 ml working solution, in line with previous approaches (Krishnamoorthy et al 1983;Licitra et al 1998Licitra et al , 1999Coblentz et al 1999). Thus, final enzyme concentrations in 50 ml buffer solution ranged from 0.016 to 0.160 U/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%