2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the trunk heat balance method including measurement of zero and reverse sap flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, all initial data were preprocessed in a few steps, including verification, correction of errors, and noise reduction by averaging to hourly mean values. Preprocessing raw sap flow data also included correction of Q values considering heat losses from the point of measurements to the environment, known as sap flow baseline [31], and averaging to hourly time series. In 2020, after the death of tree PP1, monitoring instruments were installed in tree PP10.…”
Section: Instrumental In Situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, all initial data were preprocessed in a few steps, including verification, correction of errors, and noise reduction by averaging to hourly mean values. Preprocessing raw sap flow data also included correction of Q values considering heat losses from the point of measurements to the environment, known as sap flow baseline [31], and averaging to hourly time series. In 2020, after the death of tree PP1, monitoring instruments were installed in tree PP10.…”
Section: Instrumental In Situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the hydraulic connectivity between the soil water reservoir and the plant water pathway relies on a negative water potential gradient created by leaves water transpiration. For comprehensively investigating the plant-water relation, various sensing techniques have been developed, such as those for leaf stomatal conductance (Friend et al, 1989;Steppe et al, 2006;Blonquist et al, 2009), leaf water potential (Turner and Long, 1980;Zimmermann et al, 2008), leaf temperature (Hashimoto et al, 1984;Rahkonen and Jokela, 2003;Gontia and Tiwari, 2008), leaf thickness (Li et al, 2009;Seelig et al, 2012), stem water potential (Choné et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2012), stem diameter variation (Fernández and Cuevas, 2010), stem sap flow rate (Č ermák et al, 1973;Bakfr and Van Bavel, 1987;Smith and Allen, 1996;Trcala and Č ermák, 2012), stem water content (Wullschleger et al, 1990;Irvine and Grace, 1997) and root water potential/pressure (Fiscus, 1972;De Swaef et al, 2013). However, even though these sensors provide different physiological information to support insights into plant water status, none provides a single measure that is well correlated with the numerous factors influencing plant water stress (Kramer, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations were obtained by COMSOL Multiphysics with MATLAB and are based on solving partial differential equation by the finite element method. The partial differential equation is the following [23,24]:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why several methods for field measurement of the ascending water flow (sap flow) through a plant stem were developed (presented in chronological order): (1) heat pulse velocity [2, 5, 6, 8-10, 11, 14, 15, 21, 25]; (2) trunk segment heat balance [3,4,23,24]; (3) stem heat balance [1,19,20]; (4) heat dissipation [7]; and (5) heat field deformation [16][17][18]. These methods are thermodynamic (in practice only thermodynamic methods for sap flow measurement are used) and are based on the same physical principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%