2015
DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2015.1036346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Working Memory in Preschoolers and Its Impact on Early Literacy Skills: A Study in Deprived Communities of Rural and Urban Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the difference in the results may be because of the difference in the plasticity of the three aspects of EFs. In particular, several empirical studies have investigated the training effects of computer-based training on children's working memory; some studies found the computer-based training to be effective (Prins et al, 2011;Dunning et al, 2013;Rojas-Barahona et al, 2015; see review by Klingberg, 2010;Morrison and Chein, 2011;Spencer-Smith and Klingberg, 2015), whereas some studies also found the training effect to be insignificant (Wong et al, 2014;de Vries et al, 2015;Melby-Lervag et al, 2016). There were also contradictory results about the transfer effects on inhibition; some studies indicated that computer-based training cannot be transferred to inhibition (Spierer et al, 2013;Ackermann et al, 2018;Hessl et al, 2019), whereas others found the transfer effects to be significant (Blakey and Carroll, 2015;Sanchez-Perez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the difference in the results may be because of the difference in the plasticity of the three aspects of EFs. In particular, several empirical studies have investigated the training effects of computer-based training on children's working memory; some studies found the computer-based training to be effective (Prins et al, 2011;Dunning et al, 2013;Rojas-Barahona et al, 2015; see review by Klingberg, 2010;Morrison and Chein, 2011;Spencer-Smith and Klingberg, 2015), whereas some studies also found the training effect to be insignificant (Wong et al, 2014;de Vries et al, 2015;Melby-Lervag et al, 2016). There were also contradictory results about the transfer effects on inhibition; some studies indicated that computer-based training cannot be transferred to inhibition (Spierer et al, 2013;Ackermann et al, 2018;Hessl et al, 2019), whereas others found the transfer effects to be significant (Blakey and Carroll, 2015;Sanchez-Perez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech not only executes its main function of communication; it also provides for the development and functioning of other mental functions. Language development at preschool age has a significant impact on the development of cognitive skills (Diamond, Prevor, Callender, & Druin, 1997;Gooch, Thompson, Nash, Snowling, & Hulme, 2016;Pazeto, Seabra, & Dias, 2014;Rojas-Barahona et al, 2015) and emotional and personal development (Akhutina, Panikratova, Korneev, Matveeva, & Vlasova, 2019;Blair & Razza, 2007;Duff, Reen, Plunkett, & Nation, 2015;Slot, & von Suchodoletz, 2018;Weiland, Barata, & Yoshikawa, 2014). It also appears to be a strong predictor of psychological readiness for school learning (Pazeto et al, 2014;Rojas-Barahona et al, 2015;Japel, 2007).…”
Section: Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this moment, there are two main explanations of the nature of the relationship between language development and executive functions at preschool age. The first one derives from the idea of a gradual increase in the child's cognitive ability due to the development of his/her executive functions (Gooch et al, 2016;Rojas-Barahona et al, 2015;Bierman, Nix, Greenberg, Blair & Domitrovich, 2008;Cain, Oakhill, & Bryant, 2004;Goff, Pratt, & Ong, 2005: Nilsen & Graham, 2009Shaigerova, Shilko, & Zinchenko, 2019;Verhagen & Leseman, 2016;Weiland, Barata, & Yoshikawa, 2014).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Executive Functions and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this being so, and using digital biomarkers, one could potentially quantify the specific changes in the cognitive system induced by language learning, but more importantly, one could also determine the best cognitive foundations on which language learning could be built by virtue of establishing the reciprocal connections between domain-general executive functions and language acquisition. Furthermore, as Rojas-Barahona et al (2015) proposed, a cognitive stimulation intervention focused on these biomarkers could potentially increase and strengthen the neural network underlying language skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%