2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-021-03653-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement on the Catalytic Performance of MoO3 Nanobelts for NH3-SCR Reaction by SnO2-Modification: Enhancement of Acidity and Redox Property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning Cu/g-Fe, 4+ to Sn 2+ together result in a peak at 324 1C. [38][39][40] Moreover, the H 2 consumption of different catalysts is determined by calculating the peak area and listed in Table 3. The total H 2 consumption of these catalysts follows Cu/g-Fe 4 Sn/g-Fe 4 g-Fe 2 O 3 , agreeing well with the catalysts' activity.…”
Section: H 2 -Tpr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning Cu/g-Fe, 4+ to Sn 2+ together result in a peak at 324 1C. [38][39][40] Moreover, the H 2 consumption of different catalysts is determined by calculating the peak area and listed in Table 3. The total H 2 consumption of these catalysts follows Cu/g-Fe 4 Sn/g-Fe 4 g-Fe 2 O 3 , agreeing well with the catalysts' activity.…”
Section: H 2 -Tpr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Regarding Sn/γ-Fe, the peaks at 235 and 279 °C are attributed to the reduction of surface and sub-surface Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 3 O 4 , whereas the bulk Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 3 O 4 and part of the surface Sn 4+ to Sn 2+ together result in a peak at 324 °C. 38–40 Moreover, the H 2 consumption of different catalysts is determined by calculating the peak area and listed in Table 3. The total H 2 consumption of these catalysts follows Cu/γ-Fe > Sn/γ-Fe > γ-Fe 2 O 3 , agreeing well with the catalysts’ activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FSP-P and FSP-F catalysts also show a relatively high Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www. mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16237255/s1, Figure S1 S3: catalytic performance for all catalysts at different temperatures under 10 bar, the GHSV of 4600 mL•h −1 •g −1 , and H 2 :CO 2 = 3:1; Table S4: catalytic performance for all catalysts at different temperatures under 20 bar, the GHSV of 4600 mL•h −1 •g −1 , and H 2 :CO 2 = 3:1; Table S5: catalytic performance for all catalysts at different GHSVs under 20 bar, the temperature of 230 • C, and H 2 :CO 2 = 3:1; Figure S15: Arrhenius plots of all powder and fibrous catalysts including CP, SP, SI, CZZ (33), CZZ(66), FSP-P, and FSP-F (a) at the pressure of 10 bar and the GHSV of 4600 mL•h −1 •g −1 , and (b) at the pressure of 20 bar and the GHSV of 4600 mL•h −1 •g −1 ; Figure S16: stability of the catalysts as time on stream plots for (a) CO 2 conversion, (b) DME selectivity, and (c) MeOH selectivity; Figure S17: SEM images of fresh and spent catalysts of (a) SP, (b) SP-T, (c) SI, (d) SI-T, (e) FSP-P, and (f) FSP-P-T; references [52,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%