2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in body fat distribution and circulating adiponectin by alternate-day fasting versus calorie restriction☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
50
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, individuals lost~6% of their body weight [130], and similar weight losses have since been reported in other m-ADF protocols in the obese [129,133,134], along with reduced triacylglycerol levels and increased LDL-particle size [128,130,131]. In support of the use of modified-fasting protocols, mouse studies have shown that provision of 15e25% of calorie requirements during fasting days produced similar reductions in visceral adipose tissue mass and increases in adiponectin over 4 weeks as true ADF [116,135]. However, the small amounts of food provided during the fasting day may have been consumed relatively quickly, resulting in a prolonged fasting period.…”
Section: The Unique Case For Intermittent and Alternate Day Fasting (supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In this study, individuals lost~6% of their body weight [130], and similar weight losses have since been reported in other m-ADF protocols in the obese [129,133,134], along with reduced triacylglycerol levels and increased LDL-particle size [128,130,131]. In support of the use of modified-fasting protocols, mouse studies have shown that provision of 15e25% of calorie requirements during fasting days produced similar reductions in visceral adipose tissue mass and increases in adiponectin over 4 weeks as true ADF [116,135]. However, the small amounts of food provided during the fasting day may have been consumed relatively quickly, resulting in a prolonged fasting period.…”
Section: The Unique Case For Intermittent and Alternate Day Fasting (supporting
confidence: 79%
“…FA synthesis was measured by stable isotope incorporation, with analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mice were labeled with an intraperitoneal injection of 100% 2 H2O (0.35 ml/10 g body wt) and then provided 8% 2 H2O as drinking water for 6 -24 h, as described previously (40). Upon completion of labeling, mice were euthanized, and tissue or serum was collected and homogenized in a 2:1 chloroform-methanol solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of rodent studies (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and a small number of human studies (22)(23)(24)(25)(26) have used IER protocols, which completely restrict energy intake (i.e. 100 % energy restriction) every other day, with fasting intervals ranging between 20 and 36 h. However, the long-term sustainability of this alternate day total fasting approach in human subjects is questionable due to the persistent hunger reported (24) .…”
Section: Overview and Effects On Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 % energy restriction) every other day, with fasting intervals ranging between 20 and 36 h. However, the long-term sustainability of this alternate day total fasting approach in human subjects is questionable due to the persistent hunger reported (24) . Subsequently, the IER protocols used by most human studies (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) , and by some rodent studies (11,14,42) , have allowed a small amount of 'fast' day intake, so that energy is substantially (⩾70 %) but not completely restricted. This is often referred to as modified fasting, such that, the term fasting in this IER context denotes periods of severe (total or partial) energy restriction.…”
Section: Overview and Effects On Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation