“…Of the 15 purposely selected reports in primary care, outpatient clinics, or healthy subjects in the meta-analysis branch, the appraisal of the HE was based on a retrospective cohort pre-post intervention analysis in one study (72), in three studies on a post-hoc comparison of the RCT population to a non-RCT population (24,30,94), in three studies on the comparison of study parameters between enrollment and randomization in an RCT (28,43,51), in two studies on the comparison of persons consenting vs. not consenting to participate in a study (45,67), in two studies on the followup of study populations exposed to repeated measurements Frontiers in Medicine 04 frontiersin.org (77, 95), and in four studies comparing a population being aware of exposure to observation or assessment to a population who were not aware (33,64,83,96). The main binary outcomes that were inputted in the tables of the review manager to compute an effect size and standard error were sleeping time (28), anti-malarial drug prescriptions (33), time up and go measure (51), self-reported alcohol consumption (96), pain intensity (43), and subjective shared decision-making (95) in the RCTs or RCT feasibility studies. It was an antibiotic selection in a quasi-experimental RCT (30).…”