2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2009.00008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in Digestion Protocols for Trace Element and Isotope Determinations in Stream and Lake Sediment Reference Materials (JSd‐1, JSd‐2, JSd‐3, JLk‐1 and LKSD‐1)

Abstract: International audienceTotal dissolution is a critical step in geochemical analysis. Despite the number of published protocols, this issue still draws attention for sediment samples, which are particularly difficult to dissolve due to the common occurrence and high abundance of refractory phases such as zircon. We present tests of different chemical digestion procedures carried out on reference materials (RM) of stream (JSd-1, JSd-2 and JSd-3) and lake (JLk-1 and LKSD-1) sediments from the Geological Survey of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the reproducibility of our measurements for sediments was not as good as for the basalts, it was generally better than values reported in the literature (Imai et al. 1996, Lynch 1999, Révillon and Hureau‐Mazaudier 2009). Furthermore, our values obtained for all elements were always within the range of previously reported concentrations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even if the reproducibility of our measurements for sediments was not as good as for the basalts, it was generally better than values reported in the literature (Imai et al. 1996, Lynch 1999, Révillon and Hureau‐Mazaudier 2009). Furthermore, our values obtained for all elements were always within the range of previously reported concentrations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…A possible explanation is that the dissolution was not complete and refractory minerals such as zircon, rutile and garnet remained undissolved. Indeed, in a recent paper, Révillon and Hureau‐Mazaudier (2009) showed clearly that incomplete dissolution of these sediments was extremely common and recommended the use of HClO 4 combined with HF in Parr bombs to achieve dissolution. Not only did we use this technique but we combined it with a first dissolution step in Savillex beakers using concentrated HNO 3 to destroy organic matter prior to dissolution of the silicate minerals in the Parr bombs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Successful digestion of garnet, sphene, spinel, zircon, rutile and chromite has been performed with acid attack in sealed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bombs heated at high temperatures (> 160 °C) for several days (Yu et al . , Révillon and Hureau‐Mazaudier ). Acid mixtures of different combinations have been applied for the digestion of refractory mineral phases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A mixture of HF/HNO 3 /HClO 4 is frequently used and seems to be more effective for the dissolution of granitoid and sediment samples than HF/HNO 3 as reported in Pretorius et al . () and Révillon and Hureau‐Mazaudier (). The HF/HNO 3 /HClO 4 mixture boils at a higher temperature, and this does not just benefit the removal of HF but also increases dissolution efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%