2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in estimating an acoustic target strength–length relationship for hoki (Macruronus novaezeladiae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Dunford et al (2015) proposed an alternative method of deriving TS-size equations, calculating regression coefficients in the linear domain (σ bs ) first using nonlinear weighted regression and then transforming regression coefficients to the linear (TS) domain. Dunford et al (2015) suggested the use of their method because mean TS calculated in the linear domain differs from that calculated in the logarithmic domain; however, our method also correctly calculates a mean in the linear domain before transforming to the logarithmic domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Dunford et al (2015) proposed an alternative method of deriving TS-size equations, calculating regression coefficients in the linear domain (σ bs ) first using nonlinear weighted regression and then transforming regression coefficients to the linear (TS) domain. Dunford et al (2015) suggested the use of their method because mean TS calculated in the linear domain differs from that calculated in the logarithmic domain; however, our method also correctly calculates a mean in the linear domain before transforming to the logarithmic domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Dunford et al (2015) proposed an alternative method of deriving TS–size equations, calculating regression coefficients in the linear domain (σ bs ) first using nonlinear weighted regression and then transforming regression coefficients to the linear (TS) domain. Dunford et al (2015) suggested the use of their method because mean TS calculated in the linear domain differs from that calculated in the logarithmic domain; however, our method also correctly calculates a mean in the linear domain before transforming to the logarithmic domain. Furthermore, given the large body of literature (Love 1971; Frouzova et al 2005; Simmonds and MacLannen 2005; Brooking and Rudstam 2009; Pollum and Rose 2016) in which mean TS (calculated in the linear domain) has been regressed on fish L , we are confident that our methods produce meaningful TS–size equations for Gizzard Shad.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoki are in the Merlucciidae family, made up of 24 species and 5 Genera, distributed throughout the Atlantic, eastern Pacific, Tasmania and New Zealand, often in sub-antarctic waters (Alyling & Cox, 1982). As an abundant commercial finfish species in New Zealand waters, hoki is New Zealand's largest fishery and is exported all over the world (Dunford et al, 2015;McKenzie, 2017). Hoki are widely distributed throughout New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone at depths from 50 -1000m, although they are typically caught between 400-600m in southern regions, preferring cooler water temperatures (Hamer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Hoki (Macruronus Novaezelandiae Hector 1871)mentioning
confidence: 99%