2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-020-01268-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in the Extractive and Carbohydrate Analysis of Sugarcane Bagasse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The extractives of peach palm inner sheath and peach palm peel were 35.12 ± 2.05 g/100 g of material and 30.20 ± 1.80 g/100 g of material, respectively. These extractive values are higher than those found in other lignocellulosic residues such as sugarcane bagasse (8.67-19.5%) [28], rice husk (1.82%) [29], and wheat straw (4.2-4.6%) [30]. The lignocellulosic fibers, with or without P. ostreatus-treatment, were further evaluated using three physical methods: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) The FTIR spectroscopy of untreated and pretreated samples is generally performed by focusing on the modifications in the bands corresponding to lignin, cellulose and hemicelluloses (Figure 3).…”
Section: Chemical and Physical Characterization Of Untreated And P Os...contrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extractives of peach palm inner sheath and peach palm peel were 35.12 ± 2.05 g/100 g of material and 30.20 ± 1.80 g/100 g of material, respectively. These extractive values are higher than those found in other lignocellulosic residues such as sugarcane bagasse (8.67-19.5%) [28], rice husk (1.82%) [29], and wheat straw (4.2-4.6%) [30]. The lignocellulosic fibers, with or without P. ostreatus-treatment, were further evaluated using three physical methods: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) The FTIR spectroscopy of untreated and pretreated samples is generally performed by focusing on the modifications in the bands corresponding to lignin, cellulose and hemicelluloses (Figure 3).…”
Section: Chemical and Physical Characterization Of Untreated And P Os...contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The extractives of peach palm inner sheath and peach palm peel were 35.12 ± 2.05 g/100 g of material and 30.20 ± 1.80 g/100 g of material, respectively. These extractive values are higher than those found in other lignocellulosic residues such as sugarcane bagasse (8.67-19.5%) [28], rice husk (1.82%) [29], and wheat straw (4.2-4.6%) [30].…”
Section: Chemical and Physical Characterization Of Untreated And P Os...contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Extractives correspond to non-chemically bound substances from the lignocellulosic matrix. According to Barbosa et al [25], substances such as waxes, saponins, resins, and phenols make up extractives from sisal samples. In the present study, the extractive contents were 23.2%, 33.4%, and 24.3% for Hybrid Itaporanga, Hybrid Bahia, and Mutant-1 agave residues, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Barbosa et al. [25], substances such as waxes, saponins, resins, and phenols make up extractives from sisal samples. In the present study, the extractive contents were aromatic ring (890 cm − 1 ) [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%