2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2017.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements on deinterleaving of radar pulses in dynamically varying signal environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following section, a comparative study of SOFM [15] and SANT-SOFM is accomplished to evaluate the radar pulse de-interleaving performance of the two algorithms. The performance evaluation involves the network topology, the number of sample hits and the clustering result.…”
Section: Simulation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following section, a comparative study of SOFM [15] and SANT-SOFM is accomplished to evaluate the radar pulse de-interleaving performance of the two algorithms. The performance evaluation involves the network topology, the number of sample hits and the clustering result.…”
Section: Simulation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interval [0,3] with a step size of 1 is used for searching optimal initial neighborhood radius. The 2-dimensional grid search [15] based on the principal component analysis (PCA) is used to initialize the SOFM network.…”
Section: Simulation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When there are signals transmitted by multiple radars simultaneously, an interleaved stream of pulses is received by an electronic support system. The following task is to separate these signals [8], [9] and thus to identify the source emissions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical PRI transform is optimised in [5, 6]. The algorithms of [7, 8] are based on neural networks. In [9], a decision method based on the variance of the difference in amplitude peak‐to‐peak intervals was introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%