Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2976749.2978421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements to Secure Computation with Penalties

Abstract: Motivated by the impossibility of achieving fairness in secure computation [Cleve, STOC 1986], recent works study a model of fairness in which an adversarial party that aborts on receiving output is forced to pay a mutually predefined monetary penalty to every other party that did not receive the output. These works show how to design protocols for secure computation with penalties that tolerate an arbitrary number of corruptions.In this work, we improve the efficiency of protocols for secure computation with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to limit the role of a TTP [2,5] proposed the distinction between the optimistic and pessimistic case of fair exchange. Since the emerge of blockchain technologies, smart contracts are considered as TTP, and there are numerous works that use smart contracts to improve on the fairness properties of cryptographic protocols [1,3,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to limit the role of a TTP [2,5] proposed the distinction between the optimistic and pessimistic case of fair exchange. Since the emerge of blockchain technologies, smart contracts are considered as TTP, and there are numerous works that use smart contracts to improve on the fairness properties of cryptographic protocols [1,3,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches require a number of rounds depending on the circuit depth, but achieve a notion of fairness. Fairness can also be achieved in off-chain multi-party protocols using incentives, e.g., by crypto-currencies, or trusted hardware on the blockchain [11,12,23,39,40]. In contrast, BOREALIS assumes honest majority, but optimizes efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach is to penalize a faulty participant upon aborting in an MPC, hence make the adversary lose some digital cash in proportion to their actions. For instance, [36] and [37] require the adversary to make deposits and forfeit them upon dropping out. Unfortunately those protocols are not usable in our scenario.…”
Section: Beyond Security-with-abortmentioning
confidence: 99%