Motion and Vibration Control
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9438-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Absorption of Sound Using Active Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the amplitudes of forward scattered waves will be affected, and the resulting (modal) wave propagation cannot be detached from specifics such as the geometry of the laboratory [14]. As these limitations are not inherent to (active) radiation boundary conditions, an active control of the wave field on the edge of the domain e.g., [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] appears more appropriate to mitigate the influence of the boundary. Here, we present a fundamentally new laboratory for physical, real-time, acoustic immersive wave propagation experiments using active boundary control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the amplitudes of forward scattered waves will be affected, and the resulting (modal) wave propagation cannot be detached from specifics such as the geometry of the laboratory [14]. As these limitations are not inherent to (active) radiation boundary conditions, an active control of the wave field on the edge of the domain e.g., [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] appears more appropriate to mitigate the influence of the boundary. Here, we present a fundamentally new laboratory for physical, real-time, acoustic immersive wave propagation experiments using active boundary control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.1 shows that these boundary sources can generate wave energy that exactly annihilates the outgoing waves and their reflections when they arrive at the boundary. This boundary wave absorption is the main goal of developing active anechoic chambers in which waves do not reflect at the boundary of the experimental domain (Guicking & Karcher, 1984;Orduña Bustamante & Nelson, 1992;Bobrovnitskii, 2006;Friot et al, 2009;Habault et al, 2017).…”
Section: Wavefield Control Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%