2014
DOI: 10.1080/19320248.2013.840550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Access to Community-Based Food Systems in Adelaide, South Australia: Strategies to Encourage Low-Socioeconomic Status Groups to Participate

Abstract: The benefits of community-based food systems (CFSs) are well documented; however, evidence suggests limited access for socioeconomically disadvantaged people. Focus groups with low-socioeconomic status (SES) individuals explored enablers and barriers to using CFSs and potential modifications to enhance their participation. Participants believed that CFSs must improve their affordability and convenience and provide more information to enhance access by low-SES groups. Participant-generated strategies addressed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When asked about using FMs and CSAs, focus group participants expressed interest in accessing these food systems as they provided quality produce, leisure and learning opportunities, and fostered social connectedness. These aspects are described and discussed elsewhere and align with enablers identified in existing literature . Some had previously engaged with these initiatives; however, high costs prevented frequent patronage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When asked about using FMs and CSAs, focus group participants expressed interest in accessing these food systems as they provided quality produce, leisure and learning opportunities, and fostered social connectedness. These aspects are described and discussed elsewhere and align with enablers identified in existing literature . Some had previously engaged with these initiatives; however, high costs prevented frequent patronage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Previous research explored enablers and barriers to accessing CFSs with low SES groups in North America and Australia and identified solutions to improve access . Others investigated CFS providers' perspectives and actions regarding improving access for low SES groups .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we look at the analytical approach focused on studying food governance that is structured around the AFN. In this paper, AFNs-which in the literature are variably called local food systems (Hinrichs 2000;Allen 2010; Papaoikonomou and Ginieis 2017), short food supply chains (Aubry and Kebir 2013;Mundler and Laughrea 2016), valuebased food supply chains (Bloom and Hinrichs 2011b;Berti and Mulligan 2016), community-based food systems (Markow et al 2014) or organic food networks (Favilli et al 2015) are defined as coalitions of actors pursuing alternative modalities so as to allocate resources to the food chain, make food production happen and govern the chain's processes (Manganelli et al 2020).…”
Section: Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%