2018
DOI: 10.1177/0272684x17749568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Access to Delivery Care and Reducing the Equity Gap Through Voucher Program in Bangladesh: Evidence From Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Abstract: To test a statistically significant change in delivery by medically trained providers following introduction of a demand-side financing voucher, a population-based quasi-experimental study was undertaken, with 3,300 mothers in 2010 and 3,334 mothers at follow-up in 2012 in government-implemented voucher program and control areas. Results found that voucher program was significantly associated with increased public health facility use (difference-in-differences (DID) 13.9) and significantly increased delivery c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses support 2 main conclusions. First, the introduction of the MHVS was positively associated with selected maternal health services, particularly the probability of delivering in a health facility, which is consistent with the literature on the impact of voucher schemes in LMICs [33], including Bangladesh [20,23,24,27,28]. Second, despite having a longer period of follow-up than most extant evaluations [31,33], we did not observe attendant reductions in stillbirth, neonatal mortality, or infant mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analyses support 2 main conclusions. First, the introduction of the MHVS was positively associated with selected maternal health services, particularly the probability of delivering in a health facility, which is consistent with the literature on the impact of voucher schemes in LMICs [33], including Bangladesh [20,23,24,27,28]. Second, despite having a longer period of follow-up than most extant evaluations [31,33], we did not observe attendant reductions in stillbirth, neonatal mortality, or infant mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, this research cannot inform inference regarding the causal effect of the MHVS. The only quasi-experimental evaluation, a differences-in-differences analysis that compared changes in outcomes for 11 upazilas before and after they were added to the program in 2010 to corresponding changes from 11 matched control upazilas, suggests that the program increased use of public facilities, but did not influence the proportion of women receiving maternal health services unless the treated group was restricted to 5 high-performing upazilas [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the effectiveness of health services innovations (viz., targeted service delivery, demand-side nancing, and contracting out facilities) in improving equity in low and lower-middle-income countries was found to be contingent on the government's capacity to enforce accountability mechanisms and provide adequate program inputs ( nancing and workforce) [69,70]. Demand-side nancing schemes, in particular, were found to improve equitable skilled delivery care when facilities had higher service readiness [71,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few of the previous studies use modern study designs that would enable them to draw conclusions about the causal effect of voucher programmes. One exception is Keya et al [13], who follow a difference-indifference approach to evaluate a voucher programme aimed at delivering care in Bangladesh. The results show a significant increase in public health facility use and an increase in delivery complication management care.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%