2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 10‐years of practice‐based evidence

Abstract: Objectives Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is a national‐level dissemination programme for provision of evidence‐based psychological treatments for anxiety and depression in the United Kingdom. This paper sought to review and meta‐analyse practice‐based evidence arising from the programme. Design A pre‐registered (CRD42018114796) systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods A random effects meta‐analysis was performed only on the practice‐based IAPT studies (i.e. excluding the clinical trial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

19
117
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
19
117
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wakefield et al . (2020) were strangely mute on this point. They similarly failed to acknowledge that the ‘IAPT’s studies’ involved no independent assessment of IAPT client’s functioning and there was no use of a ‘gold standard’ diagnostic interview.…”
Section: Allegiance Bias and Real‐world Outcomementioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Wakefield et al . (2020) were strangely mute on this point. They similarly failed to acknowledge that the ‘IAPT’s studies’ involved no independent assessment of IAPT client’s functioning and there was no use of a ‘gold standard’ diagnostic interview.…”
Section: Allegiance Bias and Real‐world Outcomementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the Wakefield et al . (2020) paper all the authors declare ‘no conflict of interest’. But the corresponding author of the study, Stephen Kellett, is an IAPT Programme Director.…”
Section: Allegiance Bias and Real‐world Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations