Improving access to psychological therapies: Analysis of effects associated with remote provision during COVID‐19

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 had an immediate impact on the way Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) services in the United Kingdom were delivered, requiring services to move to remote therapy. While remote therapy has been shown to be effective, little is known about the effects associated with moving to remote therapy delivered during COVID-19 within IAPT services. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the characteristics of those undergoing remote therapy and test the effects associated with the effect of remote delivery on anxiety and depression symptoms compared with in-person therapy before lockdown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional benchmark comparison of remote therapy across four IAPT services in Greater Manchester. Routinely collected measures of anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) were used to compare effects across the two time periods. A mixed-effects model was conducted to assess within and between group changes in anxiety and depression, while controlling for pre-specified confounders. Findings: Remote therapy did not appear to impact on service provision, with the number of sessions offered and attended being similar to those prior to COVID-19. Both face-to-face (pre-COVID-19) and remote therapy (during COVID-19) were associated with variable improvements in anxiety and depression with no significant difference between them. However, remote therapy was associated with a more rapid decrease in symptoms in comparison with face-to-face treatment. Mean improvement in symptoms was small and

Developing the Youth Mental Health Clinic in Hong Kong: refocus and revisit of clinical practice for youth in the new millennium

“…For psychosocial interventions, it is essential to involve the youth and collaborate with multidisciplinary colleagues to achieve synergism, proactive management of stressors, and patient empowerment. The high digital literacy of the youth would be an advantage for implementing simplified and effective psychological intervention such as in IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) 50 in the digital platforms. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that computerised cognitive behavioural therapy showed efficacy for reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in adolescents and young adults, compared with passive controls.…”

Uncovering Brainworking Recursive Therapy: A Comprehensive Examination of Subconscious Response Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications

“…The rise of digital mental health solutions has opened new avenues for BWRT's application. As online therapy platforms become more prevalent, BWRT's principles have shown promising adaptability to these formats (Capobianco et al, 2023). This adaptability is particularly relevant considering the increasing need for remote mental health support during and following the COVID-19 pandemic (Relojo-Howell, 2022).…”

“…The theory was catalysed by Libet's (1985) discovery of the "cognitive gap, " indicating that human free will might not operate conventionally. This insight opened doors for innovative interventions in psychological therapies (Capobianco et al, 2023;Gulnoza et al, 2023;Miller et al, 2023). Understanding the automatic nature of threat reactions mediated by primordial brain structures led BWRT developer to focus on reshaping those reactions.…”

A qualitative feasibility and acceptability study of an acceptance and commitment-based bibliotherapy intervention for people with cancer

“…Some of the barriers to accessing cancer-related psychological support include resource constraints ( Vaccaro et al, 2019 ), psychiatric symptoms adversely impacting on engagement with services ( Leahy et al, 2021 ), stigma ( Gurren et al, 2022 ) and individuals’ expressing concerns about the nature of the available interventions ( Christy et al, 2013 ). Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic has further shone a light on the need for greater variety of forms of remote delivery of psychological interventions ( Wright and Caudill, 2020 ), and studies assessing efficacy and acceptability of such interventions are required ( Capobianco et al, 2023 ; Nguyen et al, 2022 ).…”